Skip to main content

Ray Raymond v. Territory of Washington. Charge

 

Territory of Washington
County of Spokane}
In the District Court of the 4th Judicial district holding terms at county seat of Spokane County

Territory of Washington
vs.
Ray Raymond Defendant

Territory of Washington County of Spokane W.T. Ray Raymond being first fuly sworn on my oath state: I am defendant above named and I am not guilty of the crime with which I am charged in this indictment nor of any offense therein contained against the laws of Washington Territory. I believe I cannot have a fair trial of this cause in the county of Spokane on account of and owing to the prejudice and excitement against me in and among the inhabitants of said County, and I ask to be tried by disinterested triers. That among the facts upon which such belief is founded I state the following:

I have a number of bitter personal enemies in the city of Spokane Falls in said County, whom am informed and believe, and upon such information and belief allege have ever since I was accused of this crime busied themselves industriously circulating false statements purporting to be the facts relating to this case and also in circulating rumors and false   to the effect that I am a dangerous and quarrelsome attention and given to the wanton and reckless use of firearms, and so persistently has this statement been made that many good people of the county have come to believe it and to repeat it as true; that many false and, malicious statements and charges against this defendant have been circulated among the inhabitants of said county among which I am informed and believe, and upon that information and belief alleges that since I was accused of the crime it has been circulated among and is generally believed by the people of the county, that I had therefore murdered my husband and had killed two men & one woman in matters are of which are wholly false but have tended greatly to excite and prejudice the people of the court, against me that many false and exagerated and highly colored and prejudicial account, purporting to be the facts in this case have been invented among the people of the county among other false and untrue statements purporting to be the facts in this case circulated since I was accused of this crime was is the following

 

I am informed and believe, and upon such information and belief allege that one George Ferster, who appearing as a special prosecuter against me at the hearing of the habeas corpus application to admit me to bail heard before this court about the thing of such having stated That the prosecution had witnesses to prove that at the time of the killing with which I am charged the deceased was in the hallway of the "Bay Window" house and near the door and that two men had hold of him putting him out and had [?] him to his knees and had hold of him and that this affiant came out of her room with a loaded and cocked revolver and said [?] him I'll fix him and thrusting the revolver in his throat fired the shot that killed him applicant here states politely that such statement of the facts in this and is wholly untrue and alleges upon her information and belief that the prosecution never at any time had any person who could swear his was part of it many thing resembling it applicant is further informed and believes that this story was circulated   among the people of this county until many good people came to believe it to be the true statement of facts in the case, and am greatly prejudiced against defendant by reason thereof that whether or not said special prosecutor was employed against defendant volunteered to prosecute her affiant does not know but affiant has been informed and believes that citizens of Spokane Falls attempted to employ special council to assist in her prosecution.

Applicant further states that during the time of the preliminary hearing of this case before justices Peel and Booge she heard many expressions of bitter prejudice against her from among the crowd of people in attendance and heard the crowd stomp their feet in approval of the final determination of such hearing justices in holding defendant for murder in the first degree without bail and during said hearing witnessed many strong manifestations of prejudice and excitement against her and was became alarmed for her own safety, applicant has heard and the affidavit of her attorney Thomas C. Griffitts hearin and   knows many of the facts therin stated concerning the occurances at the preliminary hearing before said Justices of her own knowledge, and concerning the publications in the newspaper therin referred to and knows such statement to be true and she refuted said affidavit and to the affidavit of her other comments herein filed and to the other affidavit filed in support of this motion force were specific statement of the facts and circumstances upon which she bases her belief in the prejudice of the people – I have stated the facts constituting my defenses herin truly and fully to my council in this cause and endorsed[?] by them that I have a good defense and one that can be made available herein if I can have a fair trial; that this application is not made for delay but in good faith and that Justice may be done.

Ray Raymond

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2nd day of Dec. 1886

J. Kennedy Stout

Notary Public
Wash. Terr.

Terr. of Washington
vs.
Ray Raymond
Deft.

Affidavit
Ray Raymond
Filed Dec. 4 1886
D.A. Clement
Clerk

Citation

Katrina Jagodinsky, Cory Young, Andrew Varsanyi, Laura Weakly, Karin Dalziel, William Dewey, Erin Chambers, Greg Tunink. “Ray Raymond v. Territory of Washington. Charge.” Petitioning for Freedom: Habeas Corpus in the American West, 1812-1924, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Accessed November 24, 2024. https://petitioningforfreedom.unl.edu/documents/item/hc.case.wa.0162.063

Back to top