Skip to main content

S. M. McFarland v. Territory of Washingon. Petition

 

In the District Court of Columbia County Washington Territory, holding terms at Dayton.

Before Hon. William G. Langford Judge of the above named Court.

In the matter of the application of S.M. McFarland for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Complaint

To the Hon. William G. Langford Judge of the above Court and associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Washington.

The petitition of S.M. McFarland the plaintiff respectfully shows:

1st That he is illegally imprisoned detained confined and restrained of his liberty by N.R. Marquiss Sheriff of Columbia County, Washington Territory, that he is now confined by your Sheriff in the County Jail at the City of Dayton in the County and Territory aforesaid.

2nd That the cause or pretense of such imprisonment and restraint according to the best of the knowledge and belief of the applicant is this; that applicant was brought before W.H Kuhn one of the Justices of the Peace in and for Columbia County Washington Territory, for examination upon a charge of having removed certain personal property upon which he had   given a Mortgage from the County of Columbia, Where said property was situated at the date of said mortgage, and before said Mortgage was duly released or without the consent in writing of the mortgage, and upon such examination the said Justice of the Peace ordered the said applicant to be held to answer said charge before the Grand Jury of Columbia County. And the said Sheriff N.R. Marquiss claims to hold keep imprison and restrain applicant of his liberty by virtue of a commitment issued by said Justice of the Peace authorizing him to take into his custody and safely keep said applicant

3rd That such restraint is illegal in this: That the complaint upon which said applicant was arrested and examined does not charge the commission of any acts which are made criminal by the laws of Washington Territory, and that the said charge upon which the applicant was arrested examined and committed is not a crime or offense under the laws of Washington Territory or any law

That said Sheriff N.R. Marquiss has no writ of committment issued by said Justice of the Peace or any Justice charging or accusing the applicant with having committed any crime or offense known by the law

That said Justice of the Peace had no legal or probable cause to commit the applicant
to answer said charge or any charge and said Committment does not charge any crime or offense known to the law.

Wherefor he pays for Writ of Habeas Corpus, that the same may be inquired into and he be dischared.

SM McFarland Petitioner

Territory of Washington County of Columbia } SS

S.M. McFarland, being first duly sworn says he is petitioner and applicant above named, that he is foregoing petition and complaint is true as he verily believes

SM McFarland

Subscribed and sworn before me this 8th day of May 1888

M.M. Godman Notary Public

Upon reading the foregoing petition and complaint it is ordered that a writ of Habeas Corpus issue as prayed [?] N.R. Marquiss Sheriff of Columbia County Washington Territory, returnable [?] before me at the Court Room, in City of Walla Walla, Walla County Washington Territory.

William G. Langford
Judge

May 9th 1888

 

In Dis. Court

In the matter of application of SM McFarland for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Petition and Complaint N 1570

Filed May 9 1888 JW Jessel Clerk By U.J. Ellis Deputy

Citation

Katrina Jagodinsky, Cory Young, Andrew Varsanyi, Laura Weakly, Karin Dalziel, William Dewey, Erin Chambers, Greg Tunink. “S. M. McFarland v. Territory of Washingon. Petition.” Petitioning for Freedom: Habeas Corpus in the American West, 1812-1924, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Accessed November 21, 2024. https://petitioningforfreedom.unl.edu/documents/item/hc.case.wa.0122.001

Back to top