Skip to main content

Charles Gahres and Martha J. Gahres v. Isabella Sutton and W. H. Barrett. Defendants' Answer

 

Territory of Washington

County of Walla Walla SS

The District Court
1st Judicial District
At Chambers before Hon
J. K. Kennedy Judge
Habeas Corpus

Charles Gahres & Martha J. Gahres Plffs
vs
Isabella Sutton & W. H. Barrett Defts
answer

Defts for answer to the complaint herein filed and return to the writ in said cause issued says that they have the child in said writ described now in court.

1 Defts say as they are informed and believe that said Plffs are not the parents of said Etta Dora Cravens and

2 deny that said Plffs are the lawful guardians of said minor etta Dora Cravens.

3 Defts deny that   they or either of them wrongfully or unlawfully detain or restrain said Etta Dora Cravens of her liberty at the court of Wallula County of WallaWalla Territory of Washington or elsewhere

4 Defendants aver that said minor child has been in the posession of said defendants for about three years and now that the said child has been sickly that said defendants have been at great expense and trouble in the rearing so far of said child that they have taken great care pain and trouble with said child and have watched over the same and have become greatly attached thereto

5 That the mother of said child Martha J Cravens had no home and no   means of procuring one and did not posess the ability to take care of and provide for said child and expressing great hate and disgust for the father of said child and desirous of removing from her gaze. the child that would constantly remind her of one so hateful to her and also expressing hate for the child besought these defts to take and rear said Etta Dora Cravens promising and agreeing to leave said child in the quiet possession of these Defts if they would agree so to do. Defts aver that they did on the day of August AD 1868 take said child from its mother Martha J Cravens under said arrangement and have kept and provided for the same ever since defts aver that the disposition manifested toward   said child by its mother aforesaid renders her an improper person to have control of said child

6 Defts aver that said Plffs are residents of the state of Oregon and have it in contemplation and threaten to take the said minor child Etta Dora Cravens out of and beyond the jurisdiction of this court

7 Defts aver that they are proper persons to have the care control and custody of said child that they have no children of their own that they are willing able and anxious to keep and take care of rear and educate said child

Wherefore Defts ask that said petition of Plffs be dismissed and the   prayer thereof be denied and that said child be remanded to the custody of these Defts and for costs

W. A. George & N. T. Catin attys for defts

Citation

Katrina Jagodinsky, Cory Young, Andrew Varsanyi, Laura Weakly, Karin Dalziel, William Dewey, Erin Chambers, Greg Tunink. “Charles Gahres and Martha J. Gahres v. Isabella Sutton and W. H. Barrett. Defendants' Answer.” Petitioning for Freedom: Habeas Corpus in the American West, 1812-1924, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Accessed November 21, 2024. https://petitioningforfreedom.unl.edu/documents/item/hc.case.wa.0004.012

Back to top