Skip to main content

Matilda v. Henry G. Mitchell and Henry C. Russell. Writ of Habeas Corpus

 

State of Missouri

St Louis County Ss}

Whereas Matilda who has petitioned to Sue for Freedom has been this day been brought before me William C Carr a Judge of the Circuit Court for said state & in said county by writ of Habeas Corpus and whereas the persons in whose possession said Matilda was found have refused to enter into Recognissance as the law requires - the Sheriff of St Louis County is therefore ordered to take possession of said Matilda & to have her [?] from time to time during the pendency of her suit for freedom taking Bond from the person having her with such security as the Sheriff shall approve in the Bond sum of five hundred Dollars conditioned that said Matilda shall at all times have reasonable liberty of attending the court & her counsel & that she shall not during the Pendency of her suit be removed out of the Jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of the St. Louis County or Subjected to any security because of her application for freedom and that the the person hiring her shall pay the hire[?] at the time stipulated & return her to the sheriff at the expiration of the time of hiring or [?] of said suit shall be [?] determined

Given under my hand at St Louis this 30th day of May 1832

Will C. Carr

Citation

Katrina Jagodinsky, Cory Young, Andrew Varsanyi, Laura Weakly, Karin Dalziel, William Dewey, Erin Chambers, Greg Tunink. “Matilda v. Henry G. Mitchell and Henry C. Russell. Writ of Habeas Corpus.” Petitioning for Freedom: Habeas Corpus in the American West, 1812-1924, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Accessed December 4, 2024. https://petitioningforfreedom.unl.edu/documents/item/hc.case.mo.0019.009

Back to top