Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
People : Steere, Asel Jr. (deputy clerk)

26 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of Don E. DeBow for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 21, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling securities without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied | writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Pearl Wilson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 2, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: disorderly conduct
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Nellie Atkins for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 16, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Ike Payne, Relator vs. Michael L. Clark, Sheriff, Respondent

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawful possession and transport of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the matter of application of Nellie Atkins for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 10, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: keeping a house of ill repute
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Dollie Dean for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 10, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: inmate of ill-governed house
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re app of Mack Dwyer for writ of H.C.

  • Earliest record date: August 28, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Mario Lozito for writ of Habeas Corpus for Francesca Lozito

  • Earliest record date: February 16, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ vacated
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Oscar J. Quinn, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 6, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drunkenness | Carceral: reckless driving
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Marie Paulson Hislop on behalf of Herbert Paulson and Robert Paulson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 16, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Otto Rose for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 7, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Agnes Smith for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 24, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: disability
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Minnie Preis for writ of Habeas Corpus for Lucile Preis, a minor

  • Earliest record date: June 22, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Sing Hi for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 3, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: disorderly conduct
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

On the Matter of the Application of Susie Hunter for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 19, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of Application of Myrtle Benson for Writ of Habeas Corpus for her minor Daughter Georgia Benson

  • Earliest record date: October 27, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Oliver Watson for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 14, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: reckless driving
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Winifred Mason for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 4, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice | Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Pearl Alma Bentley for writ of Habeas Corpus for minor son Richard Lloyd Green

  • Earliest record date: April 13, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Eddie Toman by Anna Cohen, his mother and next friend, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 2, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Aurello Coliginna for writ of Habeas Corpus for the person of Vincenzzina Coliginna

  • Earliest record date: May 24, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application for Kathleen L. Williams for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Roger H. Williams

  • Earliest record date: August 1, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John Tenozar for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 19, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: parole violation
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Harry E. Miller for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 19, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Nathan Finegold for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 7, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Marguerite Volker for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 30, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top