Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
People : Jones, Richard A.

21 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the Matter of the Application of Sam Hop and Chinese subjects, for Writs of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 28, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of I. E. Spafford for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 29, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: administering drug to cause abortion
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Alexander Brown and George Brown, infants, by their father Nicholas Brown for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 17, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Not in custody

In the matter of the application of Gustave Gunderson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 27, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Charles W. Sawyer for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 13, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of William W. Tinkham for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 31, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: false accusation
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody | released on bail

Thomas Reddington and Patrick Gallagher v. William Cochrane

  • Earliest record date: September 15, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: first degree murder
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Thomas S. Brown et al for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 15, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: military infraction
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Alice McKay for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for the Body of Mary McKay Her Infant Daughter

  • Earliest record date: November 25, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody | Interpersonal: kidnapping | Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Joseph Bowers for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 2, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Mary LeFebvre for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 21, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Wong Sam et al. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 10, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Henry Carlton for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 24, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of C. F. Reed for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 23, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the matter of the application of Charles Smith for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 9, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: attempt to defraud
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of James A. Balch on Habeas Corpus Proceedings

  • Earliest record date: June 1, 1883
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Sarah McDonough for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 25, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: disorderly conduct
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Thomas and Catherine Gilbert v. William Cochrane

  • Earliest record date: May 2, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: imprisoned for longer than term
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of John Bowler and Edward McCrink for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

  • Earliest record date: June 26, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: perjury
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Petition for writ of Habeas Corpus for the person of Nan Oy a Chinese woman

  • Earliest record date: February 20, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Deported

In the matter of the Application of Ling Quan, Lue Tue and Lee Lung for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 11, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top