Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

People

See more
People : Cornish, Albert J.

47 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In Re Application of William Hayes for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 4, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: highway robbery
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In re application of June Bent for writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 4, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: highway robbery
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Application of Edward Shelmidine and Mrs. Edward Shelmidine, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 9, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Charles DeFrance for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 5, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fraud
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Henry Smith

  • Earliest record date: September 23, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: horse stealing
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Susie Blue and Mary Woods, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 23, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drunk and disorderly
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Flora Ohler for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 28, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody | Interpersonal: kidnapping
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the application of Henry E. Smith by Florence Smith, his guardian, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 13, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary and larceny
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Henry A. Fricke, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 14, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fraud
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Not in custody

In the matter of the application of John C. Owen for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 11, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the application of Abel M. Perry for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 22, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Dot Herne for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 25, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Belden Finley for writ of Habeas Corpus for Verne A. Finley

  • Earliest record date: December 5, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody | new custody arrangement reached

In the matter of the application of Ervin E. Switzer, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 13, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Charles Philbert for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 22, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of William Herne for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 25, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Leroy Allison for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 27, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Bonnie Manion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lera Manion and Howard Manion

  • Earliest record date: June 19, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Xavier Castle for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Walter Scott for a writ of habeas corpuswa

  • Earliest record date: November 2, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: spousal custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Charles W. Willard for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 9, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Application of John Wilken for a Writ of Habeas Corpus`

  • Earliest record date: November 21, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody | ordered to be re-sentenced

Application of Ross W. Hill, by Sarah M. Hill, his mother, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 20, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

The State on the Relation of Lee McCoy vs. Samuel M. Melick, Warden Nebraska State Penitentiary

  • Earliest record date: August 13, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cattle stealing
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Gerhardt Pothoff for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 11, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Charlie Giarratano, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 9, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of William Jones for writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 1, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Antonio Pusateri, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 24, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Nora Leon Gantz, for a writ of Habeas Corpus to obtain the custody of her minor son, Lester William Teter

  • Earliest record date: February 22, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Charles Carlson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Leta Eshom, formerly Leta Bassett, for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Wilber Bassett, age 11 years, and Alma May Bassett, age 8 years

  • Earliest record date: April 5, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Perscilla Burke for a writ of habeas corpus for the release of Cleo Ross, a minor child unlawfully detained

  • Earliest record date: August 19, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of L. L. H. Austin for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 23, 1897
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: libel
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Mary Doran for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 29, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Milton F. Lamaster for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 5, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Samuel Ford for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 21, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of A. B. Burks for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 28, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Jacob Penner, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 28, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the Matter of the Application of Joseph DeKlotz for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 11, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John Finnegan for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re Application of Olive Anderson, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 22, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of John Halligan for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John Zochol for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 20, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of _____ Hayward for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 23, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of John Voboril for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 28, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Burt C. Baker, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 24, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Elmer O. DeFord, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 25, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Unknown
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top