Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

  • Writ Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution 36

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
Petition Outcome : Writ Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution

36 results

Download JSON Download CSV

Ex Rel Ruth Livingston vs. Dr. Ernest T. Manning Health Commissioner, City of Omaha and Alta Burger Superintendant Detention Home for Girls, For Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 15, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention | Carceral: inmate of ill-governed home
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Matt G. Glasse for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 14, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Genevieve Shoemaker for a Writ of Habeas Corpus <Frankie LaPorte>

  • Earliest record date: March 5, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Ike Payne for writ of Habeas Corpus vs. Michael L. Clark Sheriff, Respondent

  • Earliest record date: September 12, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawful possession and transport of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re appl’n Joe Ronneburg for writ Habeas Corpus vs. Marshall Eberstern Chief of Police, John Brigss Chief of Detectives, Captain Vanous, Captain of Police of Omaha

  • Earliest record date: October 3, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of Carl Shearer for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 7, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Maud Shaw by Jud Brown for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 5, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Henry Slack for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 2, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: disorderly conduct
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Mrs. Alice Stanley for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 13, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of William Wernsen for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 25, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of B. E. Atherton for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 28, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: family abandonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In the matter of application of Cloid J. Wilson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 29, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Frances Anzalone by Sebastino Anzalone (her husband) and Joe Valendi (her father) for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 12, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention | Institutional: spousal custody | Carceral: marriage within legal degree of consanguinity
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Anna Citta for writ of Habeas Corpus for Francis Citta

  • Earliest record date: July 29, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Harry L. Hunsaker for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Genevieve Hunsaker

  • Earliest record date: September 24, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Harry H. Schiffler father of Kathryn Elizabeth Schiffler, minor, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 11, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Charles Saap for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 29, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Sing Hi for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 3, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: disorderly conduct
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Harry Dragoun for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 29, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: maiming and disfiguring while driving | Carceral: reckless driving
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Joseph Buckley for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 6, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Edward Toman for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 7, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified | Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Joe Vacarro for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 23, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of George Painter for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 18, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Effie Norland for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 2, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Louis Loukas for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 9, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wife desertion | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of William Maier. Alias William Maher for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 15, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawful possession and transport of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of William Chapman for a writ of Habeas Corpus (husband of Mildred Chapman)

  • Earliest record date: October 13, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: marital dispute
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Charles [Charles scratched out] Mae Smith for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 6, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of J. H. Walker for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Louis Digilo alias Louis Marion

  • Earliest record date: November 13, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Edgar I. Fuller for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 27, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Eddie Toman by Anna Cohen, his mother and next friend, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 2, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of John Tenozar for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 19, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: parole violation
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Anna Nocita for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 3, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Philmore David and Ellison Blackford for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 20, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Marguerite Volker for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 30, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Harry Chandler for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 9, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top