Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
Earliest Record Date : 1902

32 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of John H. Allen for writ of Habeas Corpus for J. C. Allen Jr.

  • Earliest record date: January 25, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: kidnapping
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Edward L. Dodder for writ of Habeas Corpus for Ruthie Ewart

  • Earliest record date: February 3, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Edward Ladd for writ of Habeas Corpus Case No:34690

  • Earliest record date: February 11, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Lewis G. Walsh for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 13, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: painting on private bill boards
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Joseph Lewis for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 1, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obstructing a street
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of James Brown for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 4, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: posting bills or advertisements
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Andrew Knup for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 16, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Ruby Gertrude Denny a minor for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 2, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In the matter of the application of R. D. Watson for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 3, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Frances Palmer for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 18, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Sarah D. Bassett for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 18, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Schuler Becker for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 7, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: peddling without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the app of Florence Garrison et ux for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 2, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the re-application of Thomas S. Thompson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 2, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: peddling without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Max Rosenthal, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 25, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: maintaining a solicitor without having a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Imprisonment C. C. Smith Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 18, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: being a disorderly person
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Lee Fong for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 14, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: violation of city ordinance
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Sarah Dee for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for Harry Dee

  • Earliest record date: October 28, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Geo Nelson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 11, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Maude Cooper for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Kenneth Cooper, otherwise known as Albert Silas

  • Earliest record date: November 29, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached | released from custody

In the matter of the Application of Thomas Janda and Frances Janda, for a writ of Habeas Corpus for the body of Joseph Janda, a minor under the age of 21 years

  • Earliest record date: December 2, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: desertion | Institutional: underage military enlistment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Petition of Frank E. Sims for Habeaus Corpus for F. W. Beyer

  • Earliest record date: December 10, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Petition of Frank E. Sims for Habeaus Corpus for F. W. Beyer

  • Earliest record date: December 10, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the petition of M. Bartlett for a writ of Habeas Corpus for L. Bartlett

  • Earliest record date: December 20, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Wallace Gemmill Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 24, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: kidnapping
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Mand Schwingler for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 30, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: kidnapping
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus of O. D. Moore

  • Earliest record date: December 20, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bootlegging | Carceral: peddling without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Ex Parte: Donald McKarrecher - Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 18, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the Matter of the Application of J. A. Marcil for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 21, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: parole violation
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Paul Webster on Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 21, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: smuggling | Institutional: imprisoned for longer than term
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Application of James A. Marcil for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 21, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Institutional: imprisoned for longer than term
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Milton F. Lamaster for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 5, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top