Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
Earliest Record Date : 1885

29 results

Download JSON Download CSV

Territory of Washington v. Arlington and Johnson

  • Earliest record date: January 23, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Mary Arlington and Timothy Johnson V. Lewis Byrd

  • Earliest record date: January 23, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: opium use
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Ah Sam and Ah Who for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 21, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Petition of William Jones, William H. Doyle, Fred Williams and Alfred Woods for a Writ of Habeas Corpuswa

  • Earliest record date: February 8, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay recognizance
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Anna Vine vs. Sheldon Jackson

  • Earliest record date: March 9, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: Indian agent/superintendent | Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Sam Pong for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 22, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Petition of Arthur Powell for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 30, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: horse stealing
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

United States of America vs. Leonard Martin

  • Earliest record date: May 1, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawfully soliciting business
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Lee Kee for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 21, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: running an opium den
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application for a writ of Habeas Corpus of Edda L. A. Evenson

  • Earliest record date: July 1, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Unknown
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Territory of Washington V. Wilson D. Coyle

  • Earliest record date: April 5, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: imprisoned for longer than term | Carceral: assault with a deadly weapon
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Territory of Washington v. William C. Swartz

  • Earliest record date: July 9, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: stole one cow
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Michael Henan for discharge on a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 20, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Charles Lind of King County Washington Territory for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 24, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: indebted to saloon keepers
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Sam Hop and Chinese subjects, for Writs of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 28, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Writ of habeas corpus for Sterling P. White, an important witness

  • Earliest record date: October 12, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: appear to testify (ad testificandum)
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Alfred Woods for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 22, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of George Walker, John San Francisco and Pedro O'Brien for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 31, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: detaining sailors aboard ship
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of C. W. Hutchinson for writ of Habeas Corpus.

  • Earliest record date: October 31, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Fannie Fowle, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 20, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: wrongful enslavement | Interpersonal: wrongful servitude | Interpersonal: trafficking
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

City of Spokane v. Frankie Sutsinger

  • Earliest record date: November 27, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

City of Spokane v. Frankie Sutsinger

  • Earliest record date: November 23, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use | Carceral: running an opium den
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Otto H. Dogge for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 22, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: aiding and abetting
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Habeas Corpus for J. S. McGuire

  • Earliest record date: June 5, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Milo Yates for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 21, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Hew G. Durham for a writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of Sylvia May Durham

  • Earliest record date: December 17, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of William Golden for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 4, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of M. A. Walker for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 27, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: murder
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application of William Sigman for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 20, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top