September 14, 1914 - March 5, 1925
Petitioned on March 13, 1915
Filed before the US District Court for the Western District of Washington (Seattle, Washington)
Filed before the The Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County (Seattle, Washington)
Case ID: hc.case.wa.0221
In September 1914, Chin Quock Wah, a native of China, was denied entry to the United States, detained, and subjected to deportation. Chin Quock Wah petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus which stated three main claims: the petitioner was denied a right to appeal, denied right to counsel, and his detainment and deportation was illegal as the petitioner's father was an American citizen. Regarding the denial of appeal claim, the petition stated that the Solicitor of the Department of Labor was the one who denied the appeal, and as the solicitor was not authorized to perform the duties of the Secretary of Labor, the petitioner was denied the right to appeal. Regarding the citizenship of the petitioner's father, Chin Wing Hin was found to be a citizen before a U.S. Commissioner and issued a signed certificate stating so. Immigration officials denied this certificate as sufficient proof of citizenship in the case of Chin Quock Wah. In a memorandum, the petitioner cited precedents supporting the use of signed certificates as proof of residence and citizenship. In a separate memorandum, the respondent refuted the denial of counsel argument by stating the Chinse Exclusion Act does not entitle immigrants to representation to counsel and stated that statues give the Secretary of Labor power to allow subordinates to rule on appeals. Judge Jeremiah Neterer ruled against the petitioner and agreed with the respondent arguments, therefore discharging the writ and remanding the petitioner to the custody of the Department of Immigration. The petitioner appealed up to the U.S. Supreme Court where the decision was affirmed.
Writ denied
Remained in custody
RG21 US District Courts, Western District of Washington, Seattle, Records of the Northern Division, Case Files, 1890-1972, No. 2971
Treaty relations between the US and China; Chinese Exclusion Act; U.S. v. Williams, 190 Fed. 898; Ex Parte Mac Fock, 207 Fed. 696; Ah How v. United States, 193 U.S. 63; United States v. Lew Poy Dow (D.C.) 199 Fed. 786; Ex-parte Lam Pui, 217 Federal, page 462; Chin Yow v. United States; United States v. Redfern (D.C); United States v. Quan Wah (D.C.); United States v. Williams; People v. Van Zile; Boyd v. Glucklich; Leung Jun v. United States; United States v. Gin Fung; Lee Lung v. Patterson
Crosby, Frank L. (Clerk)
Densmore, J. B. (Solicitor of Department of Labor)
Doyle, James H. (Notary Public)
Post, Louis (Assistant Secretary of Labor)
Wilson, W. B. (Secretary of Labor)
Boyle, John M. (U.S Marshal)
Wainwright, Morton D. (Deputy Marshal)
Sargent, John H.
Lakin, Edward M. (Deputy Clerk)
Cushman, Edward E. (Judge)
O'Connell, Jos. F. D.
Makey, James D. (Clerk of SCOTUS)
Martin, Walter S. (Notary Public)
McGettrick, Felix W. (U.S Commissioner for VT)
Center, John H. (U.S. Atty for VT)
Hoskins, H. J. (Notary Public)
Harshberger, F. M. (Clerk)
Lieteh, S. E. (Deputy Clerk)
Dattin, Eshel D. (U.S. Atty)
Chin, Wing Hin [Chin, We Hue] (father of bound party)
Lakin, Ed. M (Clerk)
Cook, S.M.H. (Deputy Clerk)
Sargent, John H. (Notary Public)
Katrina Jagodinsky, Cory Young, Andrew Varsanyi, Laura Weakly, Karin Dalziel, William Dewey, Erin Chambers, Greg Tunink. “In the Matter of the Application of Chin Quock Wah for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.” Petitioning for Freedom: Habeas Corpus in the American West, 1812-1924, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Accessed November 24, 2024. https://petitioningforfreedom.unl.edu/cases/item/hc.case.wa.0221