Case Summary

Tony Carlo was being detained at the Nebraska Reformatory for an unspecified reason. E. E. Hairgrove, his attorney, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus on his behalf, which was granted. After hearing the evidence, Carlo and Hairgrove were given one week to file a brief, which they failed to do. Carlo was therefore remanded to the custody of his jailer and ordered to pay court costs.

Case Information

Petition type(s)

• Carceral

Petition subtype(s)

• Cause unspecified

Outcome

Writ denied

Fate of bound party

Remained in custody

Case Citation

RG207 Lancaster County Subgroup 9: Series 3 Appearance Docket N, p. 278; RG207 Lancaster County Subgroup 9: Series 4 Daily Journal #89: Dec. 1922-April 1923, pp. 424, 451

Source material(s)

Docket | Journal

Repository(s)

• History Nebraska (Lincoln, Nebraska)

State

• Nebraska

People

• Carlo, Tony (bound party)
• Hairgrove, E. E. (petitioner)
• Hairgrove, E. E. (petitioner attorney)
• Miller, Gus (respondent)
• Miller, Gus (responding party)
• Miller, Gus (holding party)
• Shepherd, Frederick (judge)
• Stewart, Willard E. (judge)
• Ayers, George W. (respondent attorney)

• Additional parties

  Hensel, Claude B. (sheriff)

  Longstreth, Elza M. (deputy sheriff)

  Baer, Jacob S. (clerk)

  Burcham, W. C. (deputy clerk)