Skip to main content

Wong Sam et al. v. E. V. Rugar. Answer to Return

 

Territory of Washington}
County of King

In the District Court holding terms at Seattle

In Re application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by Wong Sam et al}

Now comes the plaintiffs in the above entitled cause by Richard Osborn and decreed to the return made herein by E.V. Rugar on the ground that the [?] does not state facts sufficient to justify the imprisonment of said plaintiffs

Richard Osborn

Atty for Plfs

Citation

Katrina Jagodinsky, Cory Young, Andrew Varsanyi, Laura Weakly, Karin Dalziel, William Dewey, Erin Chambers, Greg Tunink. “Wong Sam et al. v. E. V. Rugar. Answer to Return.” Petitioning for Freedom: Habeas Corpus in the American West, 1812-1924, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Accessed December 11, 2024. https://petitioningforfreedom.unl.edu/documents/item/hc.case.wa.0087.004

Back to top