Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

See more

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Petition Year

Earliest Record Date

Latest Record Year

Court Name

Type of Source

Length of Case File

Points of Law Cited

See more

People

See more

1876 results

In the matter of the application for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Mertie L. Young upon relation of Evaline L. Young

  • Earliest record date: June 15, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In the matter of the application of Peter Wurtz for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Robert Wurtz, a minor

  • Earliest record date: June 4, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In re Application of Olive Anderson, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 22, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the petition of J. B. Montgomery for the possession of Mary P. Montgomery, an infant, alleged to be detained by Sarah J. Montgomery

  • Earliest record date: September 21, 1876
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

A. N. Jones v. Territory of Washington

  • Earliest record date: April 21, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of C. B. Parker on Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 9, 1874
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of John Halligan for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John Zochol for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 20, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Phoebe Maresch for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 21, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: medical debt
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of John Webber and Henry J. Busch for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 30, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of _____ Hayward for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 23, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In Re: Application of Frank Thompson for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 21, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re Application of John F. Decker, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 2, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: perjury
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Ordered to be re-sentenced

In Re Application of Russell and Nettie Watson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 29, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Mrs. Lee Sing Wot for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 6, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of John Voboril for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 28, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Edward Butler, for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 8, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Unknown
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re-application of Edna Lambert for Writ of Habeas Corpus vs. W. G. Seeley and Mrs. W. G. Seeley, his wife

  • Earliest record date: June 16, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Leroy Craig for a writ of Habeas Corpus against J. L. Greene, first name unknown

  • Earliest record date: April 19, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John W. Brennan for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 1, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forging of post office money orders
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of John Dougherty for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 11, 1874
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Burt C. Baker, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 24, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Cora Schaffer, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 9, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of George W. Anderson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 1, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Re-Application of Minnie Smith for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 3, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Unknown
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Elmer O. DeFord, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 25, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Unknown
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top