Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

See more

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Petition Year

Earliest Record Date

Latest Record Year

Court Name

Type of Source

Length of Case File

Points of Law Cited

See more

People

See more

1876 results

Habeas Corpus in the matter of Augusta Krause

  • Earliest record date: August 19, 1856
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody | Interpersonal: kidnapping
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Nahagawal Hatsu For Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 20, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration | Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of Rosa Teusel

  • Earliest record date: September 8, 1865
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: marital dispute
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of application of Joseph O'Hara for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 18, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with intent to commit rape
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of James Conety for a writ of Habeas Corpus for the body of James Simpson Conety, a minor under the age of twenty one years

  • Earliest record date: March 9, 1901
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: underage military enlistment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Nelson Davis for the Custody of Maggie M. Davis, a Minor Child

  • Earliest record date: November 27, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of M. D. Getchie for discharge on writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 29, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of William Maier. Alias William Maher for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 15, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawful possession and transport of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re Ah Sing and Ah Yoel

  • Earliest record date: October 25, 1873
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: tax
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Joseph Kopf vs. William H. Jones, Sheriff of Nemaha County, Nebraska

  • Earliest record date: September 18, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: first degree murder | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of William P. Trester, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 26, 1897
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with intent to kill
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of John Finnegan for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Mand Schwingler for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 30, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: kidnapping
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of W. H. Beers and E. R. Bissett for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 24, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Unknown
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of June Bent for writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 4, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: highway robbery
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of David D. Goertzen, for writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 24, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: desertion
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Nora Sullivan v. Henry M. White

  • Earliest record date: July 16, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of J. Sidney Smith for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 29, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: conspiracy to use United States mails for scheme to defraud
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re Application of Franklin Kapps for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 5, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re application of E. C. Smeeth for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 20, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Elnora Cline, an Infant, by B.M. Cline, Her Father, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 21, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown

Application of M. E. Smith for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 23, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of John E. Foye for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 11, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: Corruption of a Juror | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Charles [Charles scratched out] Mae Smith for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 6, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Henry Palm for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 19, 1878
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: murder
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Han Lee for a writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of Seo Kim

  • Earliest record date: January 21, 1874
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: trafficking
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John Bowler and Edward McCrink for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

  • Earliest record date: June 26, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: perjury
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of J. W. Kent for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 13, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: disorderly conduct
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of George Kai for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 3, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with a deadly weapon
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Alex Kisil, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 8, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration | Carceral: Violation of Immigration Act of 1917 | Carceral: advocating or teaching the unlawful destruction of property | Carceral: public charge
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Frank Neff For Writ Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 3, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Howard W. Zink for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 12, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Application of Edward Filger for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 20, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of William M. Zook For a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 14, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: spousal custody | Institutional: juvenile detention | Institutional: disability
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Application of W. H. Harris for Writ Habeas Corp.

  • Earliest record date: July 13, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: living with a prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Sam Pong for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 22, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Gussie Burns for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 28, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Allen Sharp for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 9, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

The Territory of Nebraska on relation of John Krauth vs. John Duke, Sheriff of Cass County

  • Earliest record date: October 18, 1861
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Michael Henan for discharge on a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 20, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of William Sigman for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 20, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Habeas Corpus in the matter of James D. Lloyd

  • Earliest record date: January 16, 1852
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Clifford B. Smith for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 9, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Aurello Coliginna for writ of Habeas Corpus for the person of Vincenzzina Coliginna

  • Earliest record date: May 24, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Peter A. Stohl for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 1, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of George Skyrme for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Habeas Corpus of George Roy Wood against Edward Cudihee Sheriff

  • Earliest record date: June 9, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Petition denied
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In the matter of the application for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Mertie L. Young upon relation of Evaline L. Young

  • Earliest record date: June 15, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In the matter of the application of Thomas Dennison for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 4, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of James Farrar for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 15, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top