Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

See more

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Petition Year

Earliest Record Date

Latest Record Year

Court Name

Type of Source

Length of Case File

Points of Law Cited

See more

People

See more

1876 results

In the matter of the application of Gustave Gunderson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 27, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Habeas Corpus of N. S. Randall against Chief of Police of City of Seattle

  • Earliest record date: December 12, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: no charge
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of George Arnold for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 5, 1881
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: desertion
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of Elizabeth Vincent

  • Earliest record date: May 13, 1859
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive slavery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Leroy Allison for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 27, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Habeas Corpus in the matter of John Meierco

  • Earliest record date: June 13, 1854
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: interference with law enforcement
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Maurice Greenwalt for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 27, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: robbery
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of Nelson Lawson

  • Earliest record date: June 23, 1858
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive slavery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Territory of Washington v. Mary Ann and Adaline O'Neil

  • Earliest record date: November 12, 1875
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Dora Foster for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 28, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Ruby Gertrude Denny a minor for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 2, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In Re application of John Wilson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 29, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

By the Habeas Corpus Act, State Missouri vs. John Young

  • Earliest record date: March 26, 1828
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: wrongful enslavement
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Habeas Corpus in the matter of Joseph Didier

  • Earliest record date: August 27, 1855
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with intent to kill
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of T. Blackburn for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 7, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Dawson H. Darrow for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 20, 1868
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the matter of the application of John Murray for writ of Habeas Corpus for his minor child known as Harry McCaustland

  • Earliest record date: December 23, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application for a writ of Habeas Corpus by Katie Broderick on the behalf of Thomas Broderick

  • Earliest record date: January 15, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of R. J. Alton for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 23, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor without a license
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the application of Ethel Conley on behalf of William E. Conley for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 11, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Alexander Brown and George Brown, infants, by their father Nicholas Brown for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 17, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Not in custody

Leroy Smith v. O. P. Halligan

  • Earliest record date: April 7, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use | Carceral: possession of cocaine leaves
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Order of discharge

In the Application of Sivi Vuzkov, on Behalf of Michael Zavanovitch for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 13, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: murder
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Jos. Winterhalter for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 15, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of Samuel Slaughter Negro Pet. for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 4, 1854
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive slavery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Habeas Corpus of C. L. Rhodes against Claude Bannick (Chief of Police)

  • Earliest record date: November 7, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: no charge
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of L. M. Hunter for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 20, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Harry Smith v. United States

  • Earliest record date: July 1, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Bartholomeo Massulo, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 8, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: public charge | Carceral: advocating or teaching anarchy | Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Taka Shibata for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 12, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration | Carceral: public charge
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Bertha Faust for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 14, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Harry B. Porter for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 25, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: impersonating an officer
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of James Conroy to be discharged from prison by Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 30, 1868
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the application of Andrew Anderson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 5, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Habeas Corpus in the matter of John Bartel

  • Earliest record date: June 22, 1855
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary and larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

Nick Mordavick, Plaintiff, vs. Joseph R. H. Jacoby, as Marshall of the above named District, Defendant

  • Earliest record date: April 21, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of George M. Bigelow for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 17, 1897
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forcible defilement
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Qui, a Chinaman, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 14, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: running an opium den | Carceral: opium use | Carceral: possession of opium derivatives
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Redden Jones for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 8, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Edward Gregory for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 28, 1901
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Lola Williamson for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 28, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of James Sanford for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 15, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Henry E. Smith by Florence Smith, his guardian, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 13, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary and larceny
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Wah Ni for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 11, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody | deported

In the matter of the application of Edwin T. Wentz for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 20, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fraud | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

State of Nebraska on the relation of Lille Walton, Cora Walton, Ernest Glenn Walton, Ledonia Walton, and Bessie Walton and Petition of Hiatt Elmer Walton, father of said children, for habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 4, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of application of Stanley Fox for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 18, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: statutory rape | Carceral: default of bail
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of Frances Vanhorn to the Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 22, 1865
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Bonnie Manion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lera Manion and Howard Manion

  • Earliest record date: June 19, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top