Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Petition Year

Earliest Record Date

Latest Record Year

Court Name

  • King County Superior Court (Seattle Washington) 258

Type of Source

Length of Case File

Points of Law Cited

People

See more
Court Name : King County Superior Court (Seattle Washington)

258 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of Robert White for a writ of habeas corpus and admission to bail.

  • Earliest record date: November 19, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with a deadly weapon
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the Matter of the Application of John Breen for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 15, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling and dealing narcotic drugs
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of Thomas Rice for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 16, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: Habitual Drunkenness
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of John W. Hall for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 15, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of James Sanford for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 15, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Alexander Vachon for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 4, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bigamy
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of L.S. Bartlett for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 9, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Fred Brandon for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 3, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: adultery
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Application of J. F. Riley for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 9, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: robbery
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Charles Sarvis for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 21, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of Application of John Morgan for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 21, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of H. T. Thomas for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 7, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of F. J. Smith for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 7, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with a deadly weapon
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Bert Lockerby for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 15, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bastardy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of James Shay for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 16, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drunkenness
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Not in custody

In the matter of the application of John Reilly for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 17, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drunkenness | Carceral: disorderly conduct
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Charles Pollow for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 7, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter if the application of N. F. Britt for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 19, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Ah Sing for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 19, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with intent to kill
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of Thomas Fountain for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 13, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with a deadly weapon
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Harry Brooks for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 18, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Harry Brooks for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 18, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of George Richardson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 3, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: no charge
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of James Walsh for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 12, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: opium use
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Sammy Jones for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 17, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: petty larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of George W. Loomis for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 14, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: suspicious character
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Henry Howard for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 17, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor to Indians
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of John McNeil for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 12, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: default of bail
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of JG Jeffreys for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 7, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of GL Jeffrey for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 7, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of Matt Puryear for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 8, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the matter of the application of John Hoffman for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 7, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Henry Neal for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 8, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: arson
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of G.W. Crowell for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 9, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: being a disorderly person
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of J.H. Foster for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 2, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Eugene W. Way for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 2, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the matter of the application of Victor Pinot and Mrs. Pinot for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 16, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: Commission of a felony
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of William Prido for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 18, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Petition of A.L. Parks for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 2, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of T. E. Chase for a writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of Thomas Gibbons

  • Earliest record date: February 22, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application of Thomas Boyum for Writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of Charles Sullivan

  • Earliest record date: February 9, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Carl W. Sandberg and James Johnson on Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 14, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of John Lovell and Kate Lovell for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 26, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application of Ludwig Shostrovich/Kostrouch for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 10, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: Grave Robbery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Antonia Bojar for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 2, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with a deadly weapon | Carceral: assault with intent to commit great bodily injury
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Peter Westlin for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 15, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of Application for Robert Dewar for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 6, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Mary Lanenville for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 31, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: convent
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Billy Phillips for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for Ellen Phillips his wife

  • Earliest record date: September 27, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Lou Chapman for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: Exhibiting and Flourishing a Dangerous Weapon
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top