Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Source Material(s)

Length of Case File

People

See more
Spatial.Id : hc.loc.000195

17 results

Download JSON Download CSV

James Riley v. Egbert H. Tucker

  • Earliest record date: April 18, 1861
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with intent to kill | Carceral: assault and battery | Carceral: malicious mayhem
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Sam Hing, John Sam, Joe Chinaman, Jim Kee, Ah Kee, Ah Sing, Ah Him, all Chinamen,--and James D. Patterson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 2, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: opium use | Carceral: running an opium den
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Same, Sock, and Jim for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 16, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use | Carceral: opium use
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Territory of Washington v. Arlington and Johnson

  • Earliest record date: January 23, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Ah Sing For a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 25, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Albert Tait for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 12, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application T. Toda for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 13, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: Postal Theft
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In the matter of Henri Dachez on Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 14, 1877
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied | writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Harry Smith and Barney Slomen v. United States

  • Earliest record date: July 1, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Harry Smith v. United States

  • Earliest record date: July 1, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Charles M. Helmore v. United States

  • Earliest record date: July 18, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Sam Plastino for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 25, 1911
  • Petition type(s): carceral: Violation of White Slave Traffic Act | Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application for a writ of Habeas Corpus of W. W. Wingard

  • Earliest record date: August 16, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: tampering with witness(es)
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Petition of Neil MacDonald for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 15, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: espionage act | Carceral: treason
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the petition of Raleigh M. Falconer for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 5, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: violation of liquor law(s)
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

United States of America v Aiken Salter

  • Earliest record date: August 16, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling and dealing narcotic drugs
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Nam Choey and 12 other men for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 6, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top