Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Source Material(s)

Length of Case File

People

See more
Spatial.Id : hc.loc.000096

31 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the Matter of the application of Henry E. Smith by Florence Smith, his guardian, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 13, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary and larceny
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Daniel Doody for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 21, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Thomas Walton for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 15, 1901
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Jacob H. Blessing for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 17, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of David P. Koch for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 19, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody | ordered to be re-sentenced

In the matter of the application of John Jakobowski for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 27, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity

In re application of Frank Kreishutz for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 14, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Fred Busch for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 20, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Jacob Penner, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 28, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the matter of an application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Katie Mayes

  • Earliest record date: December 12, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Peter A. Stohl for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 1, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Scott Brainard for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 8, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody | ordered to be re-sentenced

In the Matter of the Application of Milton F. Lamaster for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 5, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Joseph Boulting for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 14, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re Application of T. H. Busboom, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 13, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Oscar E. Olson for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 24, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of John Voboril for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 28, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John Zochol for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 20, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Louis Miller, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 5, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application of William Golden for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 4, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Leroy Craig for a writ of Habeas Corpus against J. L. Greene, first name unknown

  • Earliest record date: April 19, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of E. E. Koontz, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 17, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Frank McCartney for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 19, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Leroy Allison for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 27, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Application of Ross W. Hill, by Sarah M. Hill, his mother, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 20, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application of John Wilken for a Writ of Habeas Corpus`

  • Earliest record date: November 21, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody | ordered to be re-sentenced

In the Matter of the Application of James Riley, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 22, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application for a writ of Habeas Corpus by Katie Broderick on the behalf of Thomas Broderick

  • Earliest record date: January 15, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Joseph Heider for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 6, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top