Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Source Material(s)

Length of Case File

People

See more
Spatial.Id : hc.loc.000029

15 results

Download JSON Download CSV

Sterling P. White v. John Cody

  • Earliest record date: December 21, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: manslaughter
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the petition of Arthur Powell for the writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 30, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: horse stealing
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Territory of Washington V. Wilson D. Coyle

  • Earliest record date: April 5, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: imprisoned for longer than term | Carceral: assault with a deadly weapon
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Territory of Washington v. William C. Swartz

  • Earliest record date: July 9, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: stole one cow
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Writ of habeas corpus for Sterling P. White, an important witness

  • Earliest record date: October 12, 1885
  • Petition type(s): carceral: appear to testify (ad testificandum)
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

City of Spokane v. Frankie Sutsinger

  • Earliest record date: November 27, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re Frankie Switzinger for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 23, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: running an opium den
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Ray Raymond for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 26, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: first degree murder
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of John Dugan for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 30, 1887
  • Petition type(s): carceral: accessory to the crime of murder
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Territory of Washington v. George Woodard

  • Earliest record date: July 5, 1887
  • Petition type(s): carceral: unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Samuel O'Brien v. Nancy O'Brien

  • Earliest record date: February 2, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

B. Norman v. J.F. Warren

  • Earliest record date: January 25, 1837
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Joseph Deveriske v. Territory of Washington

  • Earliest record date: April 7, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Chung Him and Seid Yam v. Henry M. White

  • Earliest record date: September 13, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: deportation
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Mary E. Teller for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 11, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: murder
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top