Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Source Material(s)

Length of Case File

Points of Law Cited

See more

People

See more
Spatial.Id : hc.loc.000010

19 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the Proceedings in Habeas Corpus in behalf of Evelyn E Miller, on Petition and Application of Louis B. Millerburrb

  • Earliest record date: August 4, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody | new custody arrangement reached

In the matter of the application of William S. Garrett and John F. Meyers for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 11, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obstructing a US officer | Carceral: delaying the execution of US law | Carceral: assault with a deadly weapon
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Not in custody

In the matter of the application of Spafford Woodhull for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 7, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: murder
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Eugene F. Ladd for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 31, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Alfred Bradden for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 31, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of W. S. Summers, U.S. Dist. Atty., and Howell Morgan, acting U.S. Indian agent for the Winnebago and Omaha Indians, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 24, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: false imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the matter of the application of John S. Fair and Henry H. Jockens for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 22, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: murder
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of James Conety for a writ of Habeas Corpus for the body of James Simpson Conety, a minor under the age of twenty one years

  • Earliest record date: March 9, 1901
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: underage military enlistment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John Walker for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 25, 1900
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: Bastardy | carceral: subornation of perjury | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Thomas Ratcliff for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 30, 1901
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application of Thomas Janda and Frances Janda, for a writ of Habeas Corpus for the body of Joseph Janda, a minor under the age of 21 years

  • Earliest record date: December 2, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: desertion | Institutional: underage military enlistment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of William H. Beck and John F. Mackey for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 11, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay recognizance
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John M. Commons for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 7, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: peace bond
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Charles Green Rainbow, James Fisher and Peter Decora for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 16, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault | carceral: refusal to pay bail
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of William Walker for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 5, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault | Carceral: drunk and disorderly
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Hyman M. Stein for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 19, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: peddling without a license | Carceral: contempt of court | Carceral: municipal violation
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of William T. Anderton for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 11, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: underage military enlistment | Carceral: fraudulent enlistment
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Dennis H. Cronin, U.S. Marshal, et al., Appellants, vs. Florence Godly

  • Earliest record date: June 17, 1924
  • Petition type(s): carceral: unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor | Carceral: unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Henry W. Hall for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 19, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Unknown
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top