Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Source Material(s)

Length of Case File

People

See more
Spatial.Id : hc.loc.000003

22 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the Matter of the Application of Mark J. Wilber for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 12, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the petition of Max Selicow

  • Earliest record date: February 23, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: municipal violation
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Morris Meyer for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 6, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Wendell Phillips Herrick for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 16, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: non-support of wife | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Stanley Fox for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 18, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: statutory rape | Carceral: default of bail
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In re application of Edward Falconer for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 24, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In the matter of the application of H. J. Finch for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 12, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fraud | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Otto Rose for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 7, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of George W. Steward Father and legal Guardian and cutodian of George W. Steward Jr. Minor for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 3, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Alson B. Cole for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 24, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Joseph DeKlotz for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 11, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Robert Barrett for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 10, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application and Petition of Jesse Cain for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 17, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: contempt of court | Carceral: failure to provide for spouse
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Nick Arrigo for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 31, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Floyd Fuller vs. William T. Fenton, Warden of the Penitentiary of the State of Nebraska

  • Earliest record date: June 13, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: second degree murder
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of William Lemke, for writ of habeas corpus for Paul Lemke

  • Earliest record date: March 29, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Frank McCartney for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 19, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of John C. Owen for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 11, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Mike Indovino, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 31, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Charles W. Willard for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 9, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Allen Vincent Grammer for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 13, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Parker M. Wickstrum for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 13, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top