Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

See more

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Petition Year

Earliest Record Date

Latest Record Year

Repository

Type of Source

Length of Case File

Points of Law Cited

People

See more
Repository : Washington State Archives, Puget Sound Regional Branch (Bellevue, Washington)

359 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of Han Lee for a writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of Seo Kim

  • Earliest record date: January 21, 1874
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: trafficking
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Peter Nelson et al. v. Lewis V. Wycoff

  • Earliest record date: April 28, 1875
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: detaining sailors aboard ship
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Abigail Clauey v. King County

  • Earliest record date: May 5, 1875
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: disorderly conduct
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of David Hughes Alexander S Hughes, Joseph Brannan James Boyd and David Hart, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Against Lewis V. Wycoff, Sheriff of King County Washington Territory

  • Earliest record date: May 14, 1875
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: peace bond
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Frank Burke vs. L. V. Wyckoff Writ of Habeaus Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 21, 1875
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

Alexander Hughes vs. King County Writ of Habeaus Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 4, 1875
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: perjury
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Donald Fallon and Frank Rogers for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 6, 1876
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed | writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody | remained in custody

King County v. William Hughs and Micheal Broderick

  • Earliest record date: October 5, 1876
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal to pay bail
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of William Fox for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 16, 1878
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay court costs
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

John W Harding vs G. W. L. Allen

  • Earliest record date: December 23, 1878
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal to pay bail
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

M. T. Ward v. L. V. Wyckoff

  • Earliest record date: July 14, 1879
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: debt
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

James McGarth and William Herbert v. King County

  • Earliest record date: March 17, 1880
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: passing counterfeit currency
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Henry Imhoff for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 1, 1881
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor to Indians
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Application of Lars Brown for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 22, 1882
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: murder
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Territory of Washington v. Chin Chung. Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 10, 1882
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use | Carceral: opium use | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Application of William Spears and James McGough for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 26, 1883
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

City of Seattle v. John McLaine

  • Earliest record date: February 28, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of George R. Daly for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 15, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: horse stealing
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Sam Hing, John Sam, Joe Chinaman, Jim Kee, Ah Kee, Ah Sing, Ah Him, all Chinamen,--and James D. Patterson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 2, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: opium use | Carceral: running an opium den
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Ah Korn et al. for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 10, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Albert Rhude for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 10, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Qui, a Chinaman, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 14, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: running an opium den | Carceral: opium use | Carceral: possession of opium derivatives
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Territory of Washington v. Arlington and Johnson

  • Earliest record date: January 23, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Ah Sam and Ah Who for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 21, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

United States of America vs. Leonard Martin

  • Earliest record date: May 1, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawfully soliciting business
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Lee Kee for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 21, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: running an opium den
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Michael Henan for discharge on a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 20, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Alfred Woods for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 22, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of George Walker, John San Francisco and Pedro O'Brien for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 31, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: detaining sailors aboard ship
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of C. W. Hutchinson for writ of Habeas Corpus.

  • Earliest record date: October 31, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Fannie Fowle, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 20, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: wrongful enslavement | Interpersonal: wrongful servitude | Interpersonal: trafficking
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Charles Barnes for a writ of Habeas Corpus.

  • Earliest record date: January 4, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: breaking and entering | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Foong V. William Murphy. Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 1, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: peddling without a license
  • Petition outcome: Petition denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the restraint of Gee Lee and other Chinamen

  • Earliest record date: February 7, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Yu Gum and Yu Hung for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 7, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of Prosfrio Deffillipps and Filip Perill for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 29, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: desertion
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of C. A. Clayton, Geo Rosenthal, Wm Lewis, John McDonald, Chas Olsen, Chao Kales, Fredericke Linde, C. Roschman For a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 9, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: detaining sailors aboard ship
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Ah Ken for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 1, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of M. J. McDonough for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 21, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Order of discharge

In the Matter of the Application of I. E. Spafford for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 29, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: administering drug to cause abortion
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Alexander Brown and George Brown, infants, by their father Nicholas Brown for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 17, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Not in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Elnora Cline, an Infant, by B.M. Cline, Her Father, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 21, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Gustave Gunderson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 27, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Charles W. Sawyer for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 13, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of William W. Tinkham for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 31, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: false accusation
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody | released on bail

Thomas Reddington and Patrick Gallagher v. William Cochrane

  • Earliest record date: September 15, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: first degree murder
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Thomas S. Brown et al for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 15, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: military infraction
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Alice McKay for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for the Body of Mary McKay Her Infant Daughter

  • Earliest record date: November 25, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody | Interpersonal: kidnapping | Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Joseph Bowers for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 2, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top