Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
Age of Bound Party : Unclear

34 results

Download JSON Download CSV

Maria Whitten vs. Garland Rucker

  • Earliest record date: August 17, 1829
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: wrongful enslavement
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Carey, a man of color vs. Benjamin Wilder

  • Earliest record date: March 8, 1831
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

John vs. William Campbell

  • Earliest record date: November 18, 1831
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: wrongful enslavement
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Habeas Corpus in the Matter of Adam Marshall

  • Earliest record date: February 23, 1855
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive slavery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Habeas Corpus in the matter of William O'Neal

  • Earliest record date: June 19, 1855
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Habeas Corpus in the matter of Albert Herckenrath

  • Earliest record date: October 15, 1855
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: underage military enlistment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Habeas Corpus in the Matter of George Bailey

  • Earliest record date: August 8, 1856
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive slavery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of C. W. Hutchinson for writ of Habeas Corpus.

  • Earliest record date: October 31, 1885
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Henry E. Smith by Florence Smith, his guardian, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 13, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary and larceny
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application E. H. Hall for the Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lizzie Storz

  • Earliest record date: October 4, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Petition of David Brown for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 7, 1901
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: violation of Sunday Ordinance
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re Application of Nora Dixson, on Behalf of David Moore, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 18, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: suspicious character
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Emma Bell Wenzel (Class name Celeste), Emma Hennesen (Class name Margaret Mary), Mary McCarthy (Class name Cresentia), and Susie King (Class name Delia)

  • Earliest record date: March 18, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: imprisoned for longer than term
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re Application of Sam Butera for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 8, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the Matter of the Application of Thomas E. Downing and Kate Downing for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Nellie Downing, also Nellie Downing White

  • Earliest record date: October 27, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application Lulu Huffman for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 19, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application Lulu Huffman for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 19, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Ora Miller v. House of the Good Shepherd and Mother Superior Rachel

  • Earliest record date: March 29, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Institutional
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Roy Walker vs. Henry Dunn, Chief of Police, Steve Maloney, Chief of Detectives, Michael F. Dempsey, Captain of Police, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 23, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application Lulu Huffman for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 5, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Otto Rose for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 7, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Agnes Smith for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 24, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: disability
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Edward Toman for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 7, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified | Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of J. C. A. Houselighter for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 26, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: inmate of ill-governed home
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

To Rolla Rose Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 23, 1825
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: wrongful enslavement | Interpersonal: kidnapping
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Ma-chu-nah-zha (Standing Bear) for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 4, 1879
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application for a writ of Habeas Corpus by Katie Broderick on the behalf of Thomas Broderick

  • Earliest record date: January 15, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Walter Scott for a writ of habeas corpuswa

  • Earliest record date: November 2, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: spousal custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Application of Ross W. Hill, by Sarah M. Hill, his mother, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 20, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Anthony Han for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 4, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Habeas Corpus to F. Hickman

  • Earliest record date: April 13, 1825
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: wrongful enslavement | Interpersonal: kidnapping
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Richard A. Saunders for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 2, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Goldie Abbott for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 10, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Habeas Corpus in the matter of George Pflanz

  • Earliest record date: April 9, 1855
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: underage military enlistment
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
Back to top