Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
People : Slabaugh, Willard. W.

31 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of Martin D. Reilly and Christy Reilly for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 24, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re application of Mary Harmon for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 24, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: convent
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Charles Bird - and Josephine Bird, also known as Jack Lewis, by Irene Steward, petitioner for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 6, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Thomas E. Downing and Kate Downing for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Nellie Downing, also Nellie Downing White

  • Earliest record date: October 27, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Victor Walker for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Dessie Smith

  • Earliest record date: December 7, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Thomas McCarty for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 7, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: shooting with intent to kill and intent to wound
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the application of Eva Tolls alias Eva White for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 30, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Habib Koneiser for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 17, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Estella Meyers for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 13, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Ole Jackson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 6, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Rhoda McNamira for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 26, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of George H. Place on Behalf of his two minor children Howard D. Place and Zella V. Place for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 21, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re-application of Harry Atkinson by his next friend and father William Atkinson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 26, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: child abuse
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the Matter of the Application E. H. Hall for the Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lizzie Storz

  • Earliest record date: October 4, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

On the Matter of the Application of Walter Versteeg for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 29, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Oscar Lehmann for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 23, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the application of George Harlow for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 19, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of George Harris for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 20, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Application of Maud Ely by J. O. Ely her father for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 18, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Annie Nelson and Daisy Williams for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 23, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Kittie Owens and Mary Brown for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 21, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Gaston Akoun, Madroche Zitoune, Abraham L. Reed, and S. B. Wadley for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 30, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: violation of injunction
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Benjamin F. Dodd and Annie Dodd for Writ of Habeas Corpus on Behalf of Clara Blaire Dodd; Minnie Ray Dodd; Rose Allen Dodd, and Marvel Dodd, Minor Children of Petitioners

  • Earliest record date: June 16, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Susan M. Horn the mother and natural guardian of Nora E. Horn and Rapsie Horn for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 28, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re-Application of George Compton for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 6, 1897
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of C. V. Stortz et. al.

  • Earliest record date: April 6, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

On the Application of Henry Bell for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 26, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

On the Matter of the Application of Samuel Douglas for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 23, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of V. B. Walker, attorney for Maud Raymond for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 23, 1897
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: petty larceny
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Bertha Faust for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 14, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Joseph Nachtneble for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 12, 1888
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with intent to commit great bodily injury
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody
Back to top