Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
People : Mcdonald, John W. (sheriff)

27 results

Download JSON Download CSV

State of Nebraska on the relation of Samuel J. Coffman vs. India A. Coffman

  • Earliest record date: May 15, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Jessie Fiandt for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 3, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of the petition of Emma E. Howard for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 4, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Application for the Writ of Habeas Corpus for Mary Plunkett

  • Earliest record date: March 25, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: kidnapping
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the re-application of George M. Bigelow for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 24, 1897
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forcible defilement
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of V. B. Walker, attorney for Maud Raymond for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 23, 1897
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: petty larceny
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Susan M. Horn the mother and natural guardian of Nora E. Horn and Rapsie Horn for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 28, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Kittie Owens and Mary Brown for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 21, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Application of Maud Ely by J. O. Ely her father for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 18, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

On the Matter of the Application of Walter Versteeg for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 29, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Kittie Owens for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 3, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the application of George H. Place on Behalf of his two minor children Howard D. Place and Zella V. Place for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 21, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Fred L. Smith for a writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of Minnie Tarlton

  • Earliest record date: December 10, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Estella Meyers for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 13, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Fred L. Smith for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Annie Brown

  • Earliest record date: December 13, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Habib Koneiser for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 17, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Eva Tolls alias Eva White for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 30, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Fred L. Smith for writ of Habeas Corpus for Frank Fryson

  • Earliest record date: February 13, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Abraham Jacobs for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 25, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In The Matter of the Application of C. Larson for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 12, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlicensed ticket scalping
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Virginia Donermeyer, a minor by her next friend, Mathias Donermeyer for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 27, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In the matter of the application of Willie Vangart for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 24, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: imprisoned for longer than term
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Sarah Bailey for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Charles Bailey

  • Earliest record date: March 28, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re application of George A. Tarrant for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 24, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of James B. Palmer for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 2, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Jacob C. Caldwell for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 26, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: sabbath breaking
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of William M. Rhyn for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 4, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: sabbath breaking
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top