Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: 1815 - 1924

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
People : Magney, George A.

34 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the Matter of Angelo Rose for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 1, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of J. M. Kelso for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 23, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice | Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Joseph Tebo for H. C.

  • Earliest record date: April 19, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fornication | Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In re Application of Hugo Peters for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 26, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: carrying a concealed weapon
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Application of Rose Callahan for Writ of Habeas Corpus for James Callahan

  • Earliest record date: September 21, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: disturbing the peace
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Application of Pete Johnson for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 8, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Application of Marcus Glassman for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 20, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re Application of Sam Butera for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 8, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In re Application of Sister Florida for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 16, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Application of M. E. Smith for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 23, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Application of Pearl Lyles for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 29, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Lawrence Bock for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 23, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: suspicious character
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In re Application of Madge Howard for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 23, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment | Carceral: keeping a house of ill repute
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Application of Minnie Hall Riley for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 23, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

Ora Miller v. House of the Good Shepherd and Mother Superior Rachel

  • Earliest record date: March 29, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Institutional
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of George Hall, W. M. Thompson, and John Phillips for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 16, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Everett Whitley, John Whitley, Cora Brown for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 16, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application Susie Jackson for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 5, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Application of Anthony C. Wagner for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 4, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment | Carceral: fraud
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Ernest R. Powell for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 3, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In re application of Jim Jones for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 26, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drunkenness | Carceral: disturbing the peace
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Charles Barker for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 23, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: possession of burglary tools
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Application of Arthur Miller in the Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 16, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of George Gumm for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 8, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Jesse Fowler and Mamie Cole for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 23, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Emma Banks for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 26, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application Lulu Huffman for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 5, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Glen Hull for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 22, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of C. E. Clay for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 16, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawful possession and transport of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re application for Habeas Corpus, Charles Ferguson Relator vs. Michael Clark Sheriff, Respondent

  • Earliest record date: October 22, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of William A Mixon for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 14, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wanted for questioning
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Sam Walton for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 13, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Jim Stevens for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 6, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drunkenness | Carceral: possession of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top