Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

People

See more
People : Holmes, Edward P.

32 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of Daniel S. Conroy for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 18, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Michael J. Corrigan for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 6, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of H. A. Reese for a writ of Habeas Corpus for & on behalf of Grant Willoby

  • Earliest record date: February 11, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Henry E. Smith by Florence Smith, his guardian, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 13, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary and larceny
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of L. L. Lindsey for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 4, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of O. J. Vallicott for a writ of Habeas Corpus, for the body of Benjamin D. Mills

  • Earliest record date: May 15, 1897
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re Application of James C. Morrisey for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 30, 1897
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the Matter of the Application of Herman Granger for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 30, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Flora Ohler for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 28, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody | Interpersonal: kidnapping
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Henry Smith

  • Earliest record date: September 23, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: horse stealing
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Leonard Kephart for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 23, 1897
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: perjury
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Frank G. Bevans for a writ of Habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 5, 1900
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In the matter of the application of Theodore G. Clark, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 23, 1900
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with intent to kill
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Helen J. Holman for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 19, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of William G. Clarke, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 19, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Mark J. Wilber for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 12, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Emma Rupert for a writ of habeas corpus, for the body of Clarence Rupert

  • Earliest record date: April 9, 1900
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of John P. Whitney for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 31, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody | new custody arrangement reached

In the Matter of the Application for a writ of Habeas Corpus by Katie Broderick on the behalf of Thomas Broderick

  • Earliest record date: January 15, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Bonnie Manion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lera Manion and Howard Manion

  • Earliest record date: June 19, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Lemuel M. Dobbs, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 10, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of James Riley, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 22, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application and petition of Edward Thacker, for writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 21, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In the Matter of the Application of Gerhardt Pothoff for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 11, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of James H. Flaherty, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 25, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: consumer fraud
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Frederick Frazier, for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 17, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Milton F. Lamaster for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 5, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Louis Miller, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 5, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Joseph Boulting for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 14, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Herold James Miller, by Grace Miller, his next friend, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 26, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody | Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re Application of Olive Anderson, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 22, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re Application of John F. Decker, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 2, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: perjury
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Ordered to be re-sentenced
Back to top