Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

People

See more
People : Hoagland, Henry V. (sheriff)

31 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of Jacob H. Blessing for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 17, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Joseph Heider for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 6, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of John C. Owen for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 11, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Frank McCartney for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 19, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Dot Herne for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 25, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Belden Finley for writ of Habeas Corpus for Verne A. Finley

  • Earliest record date: December 5, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody | new custody arrangement reached

In the matter of the application of Ervin E. Switzer, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 13, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of William Herne for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 25, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Leroy Allison for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 27, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Bonnie Manion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lera Manion and Howard Manion

  • Earliest record date: June 19, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Xavier Castle for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Walter Scott for a writ of habeas corpuswa

  • Earliest record date: November 2, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: spousal custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Application of Ross W. Hill, by Sarah M. Hill, his mother, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 20, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Scott Brainard for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 8, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody | ordered to be re-sentenced

In the matter of the application of Robert Barrett for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 10, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Molly M. Martin in behalf of her minor son Earl S. Martin for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 16, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody | new custody arrangement reached

In the matter of the application of Leonidas Asimakopoulos, by his agent Gregory Pappas

  • Earliest record date: October 12, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Charles Carlson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Perscilla Burke for a writ of habeas corpus for the release of Cleo Ross, a minor child unlawfully detained

  • Earliest record date: August 19, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Elmer Estes in behalf of his minor daughter, Rosa May Estes, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 1, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of John Martin for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 18, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: attempted robbery | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re application of Estella Lyell for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 9, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Mary Doran for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 29, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Samuel Ford for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 21, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Oscar E. Olson for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 24, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of A. B. Burks for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 28, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John Finnegan for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of John Halligan for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John Zochol for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 20, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of John Voboril for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 28, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Elmer O. DeFord, for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 25, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Unknown
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top