Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
People : Day, George A.

24 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of Claude H. Goldsborough on relation of his mother Izora I. Goldsborough for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 28, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In the Matter of the Application of Abraham Jacobs for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 25, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In the Matter of the Application of Sarah Dee for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for Harry Dee

  • Earliest record date: October 28, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Howard L. Rucker for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 21, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the matter of the application of Louis A. Borsheim and Helen A. Borsheim for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 5, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In the matter of the application of Henry Cook for a writ of Habeas Corpus for and on behalf of James Garfield

  • Earliest record date: May 16, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Thomas Dennison for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 4, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Berl Bernard for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 3, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Jenny Degauy for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 3, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application for Joseph Hajek for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 17, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached | released from custody

In the matter of the application of Lillian Algoe for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 9, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: blackmail
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Robert Green for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 1, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John Alperson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 6, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling tobacco
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Charles G. Runker for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 3, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: arson
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Edward Stout for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 29, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: manufacturing a cigarette
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Victor Walker for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Dessie Smith

  • Earliest record date: December 7, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Joseph Tebo for H. C.

  • Earliest record date: April 19, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fornication | Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

On the relation of Mrs. Lottie Parsons Relator vs. St. James Orphan Asylum Respondent

  • Earliest record date: October 9, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the petition of Max Selicow

  • Earliest record date: February 23, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: municipal violation
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In re application of Mary Harmon for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 24, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: convent
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Wendell Phillips Herrick for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 16, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: non-support of wife | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In matter of the application of Carol Williams for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 9, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of W. C. Adams for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 29, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of George W. Steward Father and legal Guardian and cutodian of George W. Steward Jr. Minor for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 3, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top