Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
People : Berger, John M.

28 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of Nellie Atkins for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 16, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Nellie Atkins for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 10, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: keeping a house of ill repute
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of application of Ruth McLane for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 10, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: inmate of ill-governed house | Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Dollie Dean for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 10, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: inmate of ill-governed house
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Harry Meehan for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 7, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: carrying a concealed weapon
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Ethel Johnson for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 13, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: keeping a house of ill repute
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Dismissed

In the matter of the application of Ethel Johnson for Writ H.C.

  • Earliest record date: February 14, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: keeping a house of ill repute
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of application of William Wernsen for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 25, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of R.E. Wilkinson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 10, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of Application of A. F. Ryan for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 4, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of application of Agnes Marshall for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 13, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: inmate of ill-governed house
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Dismissed

In the matter of the application of Frederick Jacobsen for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Helen Jacobsen

  • Earliest record date: August 18, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Mamie Allen for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 25, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application for Ruth Mathews for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 27, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the matter of the application of Agnes Marshall for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 28, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the matter application of George Duncan for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 2, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Frederick Jacobsen for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Helen Jacobsen

  • Earliest record date: December 29, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Earl Thomas Beni for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 24, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: impersonating an officer | Carceral: disorderly conduct
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Fred Sailor for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 8, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In the matter of the application of Ruth McLane for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 5, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: inmate of ill-governed home
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Otto Rose for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 7, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Edward Toman for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 7, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified | Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Lela Murry for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 5, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Eddie Toman by Anna Cohen, his mother and next friend, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 2, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Merle Arlington for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 15, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Perry Hartness for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 11, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Gus A. Fagerberg for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 26, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of William J. Fox for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 3, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top