Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Petition Year

Earliest Record Date

Latest Record Year

Type of Source

Length of Case File

  • 5 or fewer pages 180

People

See more
Length of Case File : 5 or fewer pages

180 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of application of Philmore David and Ellison Blackford for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 20, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Christ Jensen for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 2, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: violation of federal revenue law
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of James Cosgrove for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 19, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Dismissed | released on bail

In the matter of the application of Sam Walton for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 13, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Mrs. Alice Stanley for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 13, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Jennie E. Turkington for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 28, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Unknown
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of George H. Harris for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 28, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Application of Arthur Miller in the Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 16, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Application of Alvin Maloney for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 27, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re: E. Stubley on Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 1, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: imprisoned for longer than term | Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Habeas Corpus of George Hanson for Florence Hansen against Louis Hansen et al

  • Earliest record date: August 6, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Habeas Corpus of James Brooks against Edw. Cudihee Shf.

  • Earliest record date: March 24, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: no charge
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Habeas Corpus of Adolph A. Gust against Edward Cudihee as Sheriff

  • Earliest record date: July 30, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Habeas Corpus of F. M. Mitchell against Claude Bannick (Chief of Police)

  • Earliest record date: December 6, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re Application of Margaret Carr, but whose assumed name is Catherine, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 23, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Emma Abbott for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 17, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re Application of Oluf Larson

  • Earliest record date: January 23, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In Re application of Theodore Hill for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by his mother Zoa G. Zeroz in his behalf

  • Earliest record date: November 23, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Solinna Palmer for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 26, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Elizabeth A Wineteer, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 16, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Mrs Bessie Pffiffer for writ H. C.

  • Earliest record date: December 13, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Casher J Davasher for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1910
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application of Mrs Blanche Folson for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 27, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of James B. Graham for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Joseph Edward Ohlson

  • Earliest record date: September 10, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Al Krugman

  • Earliest record date: November 20, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: violation of city ordinance
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Lillian Butler for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 5, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of L. J. Urann for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 22, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the petition of Ida King for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 2, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Richard Henry Walton for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 17, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the petition of Eugene Lukenger for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 6, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Jos. Winterhalter for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 15, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the petition of P. D. Hughes for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Frank Richards

  • Earliest record date: February 18, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus of O. D. Moore

  • Earliest record date: December 20, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bootlegging | Carceral: peddling without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the petition of M. Bartlett for a writ of Habeas Corpus for L. Bartlett

  • Earliest record date: December 20, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Edward L. Dodder for writ of Habeas Corpus for Ruthie Ewart

  • Earliest record date: February 3, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Fred Harris and Charles Eick for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 19, 1901
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: rape
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the petition of Fritz Lee for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 16, 1901
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of John Snyder and Charles Rhoades for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 6, 1900
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Kittie Owens for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 3, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of application for Habeas Corpus for Jay Roy

  • Earliest record date: May 3, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of George Dunn for Writ of Habeas Corpus (B)

  • Earliest record date: May 11, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Jerome K. Coulter for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 10, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application on behalf of Charles M. Bachman for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 6, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bastardy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Wilson Hike for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 10, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Lenora McMullen, on behalf of Fran McMullen for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 26, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Tom Wagner for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 11, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Henry Rasmus for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 22, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In the Matter of the Application of Sigmund Arnstein for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 29, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Michael Kennedy for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 9, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Frank Dupree for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 30, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top