Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Petition Year

Earliest Record Date

Latest Record Year

Type of Source

Length of Case File

Points of Law Cited

People

See more
Petition Outcome : Writ Dismissed

162 results

Download JSON Download CSV

Habeas Corpus in the matter of James D. Lloyd

  • Earliest record date: January 16, 1852
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Charles Gahres and Martha J. Gahres v. Isabella Sutton and W. H. Barrett

  • Earliest record date: August 1, 1868
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Lucia Martinez vs. Thomas Barrman, K. S. Woolsey, John Ammerman & Mrs Ammerman

  • Earliest record date: July 29, 1871
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In the matter of the application of Han Lee for a writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of Seo Kim

  • Earliest record date: January 21, 1874
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: trafficking
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Sterling P. White v. John Cody

  • Earliest record date: December 21, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: manslaughter
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Alexander Brown and George Brown, infants, by their father Nicholas Brown for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 17, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Not in custody

In the matter of the application of William Doran for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 8, 1887
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Frank Krebs and Pat Daugherty for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

  • Earliest record date: October 8, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Ordered to be re-sentenced

In the matter of application of M. O. Ricketts for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for the body of ‘Till’

  • Earliest record date: October 20, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: wrongful enslavement
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re-application of A. B. Cabe for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 5, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Maria Miller for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 7, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of W. H. Harvey for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 10, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of Application of Rose Dodson for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 19, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Albert Davidson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 22, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bastardy
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of John W. McDaniel for a writ of Habeas Corpus for William C. McDaniel

  • Earliest record date: June 23, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of F. J. Phillips for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 17, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bastardy
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of William Bridwell for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 8, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re: application of C.P. Bishop and N. H. McLean for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 6, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Application of Maggie Jones for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 12, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of C. S. West for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 1, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: disorderly conduct
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Chas. Graham for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 29, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: robbery
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of L. Griffith for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 1, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of H. A. Reese for a writ of Habeas Corpus for & on behalf of Grant Willoby

  • Earliest record date: February 11, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Beula Dixon and Maud Lewis for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 20, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Sigmund Arnstein for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 29, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of John McKinnon for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 13, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of O. J. Vallicott for a writ of Habeas Corpus, for the body of Benjamin D. Mills

  • Earliest record date: May 15, 1897
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Phillip McGovern for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 15, 1901
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John Walker for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 25, 1900
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bastardy | Carceral: subornation of perjury | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Joseph Lewis for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 1, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obstructing a street
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Schuler Becker for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 7, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: peddling without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Mary Moore for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for Walter Johnson

  • Earliest record date: February 18, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the petition of Peter Duncan for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 20, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Howard L. Rucker for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 21, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the matter of the application of Louis A. Borsheim and Helen A. Borsheim for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 5, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In the matter of the application of Ernest Hutchinson a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 1, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling trade stamps without a licence | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Henry Cook for a writ of Habeas Corpus for and on behalf of James Garfield

  • Earliest record date: May 16, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Peter A. Clifford, Petitioner, vs. Herbert O. Williams and Grace E. Williams, Respondents in Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 19, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In Re: Petition of H. C. Littooy for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 4, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: practising dentistry without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed | writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Berl Bernard for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 3, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Jenny Degauy for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 3, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Camille Renger for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 27, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of James Murray for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 14, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Charles G. Runker for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 3, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: arson
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Victor Walker for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Dessie Smith

  • Earliest record date: December 7, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Robert Volwiler and Lillian Volwiler Minors, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 22, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the application of Fred Schneiderwind for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 20, 1906
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of William T. Anderton for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 11, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: underage military enlistment | Carceral: fraudulent enlistment
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Morris Passovoy for writ H. C.

  • Earliest record date: July 22, 1911
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top