Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
Earliest Record Date : 1893

27 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of Adolph Krug for writ of habeas corpus and release

  • Earliest record date: October 23, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Petition denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Application for the Writ of Habeas Corpus for Mary Plunkett

  • Earliest record date: March 25, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: kidnapping
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Application of James Sparks for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 2, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: malicious destruction of property
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Matter of Application of Charles (Chas.) Stevens for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 25, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: malicious destruction of property
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application of Alice A. Parker for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 31, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In the matter of application of Sunny Luckey alias Charles Edwards for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 29, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: murder
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Application of William Shooks for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 12, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Lou Chapman for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 10, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: Exhibiting and Flourishing a Dangerous Weapon
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Billy Phillips for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for Ellen Phillips his wife

  • Earliest record date: September 27, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Charles N. Replogle, Superintendent of the Mission, upon Douglas Island, Alaska, of "Kansas Yearly Meeting of of Orthodox Friends" on behalf of Nu-Shukk, a minor Indian child, for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 2, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody | Institutional: Indian agent/superintendent
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Fred L. Grantham for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 6, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Mary Lanenville for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 31, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: convent
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Ben Shear for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 17, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: infamous crime against nature with a beast
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of August Klabunde for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 10, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of Application for Robert Dewar for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 6, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Peter Westlin for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 15, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Petition of Mrs. Duncan Ross for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for the body of her Son Hallie Sheldon

  • Earliest record date: July 14, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of M.L. Coovert for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 6, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling and furnishing cigarettes
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Carl W. Sandberg and James Johnson on Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 14, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Henry A. Fricke, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 14, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fraud
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Not in custody

In the matter of the Application of Thomas Boyum for Writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of Charles Sullivan

  • Earliest record date: February 9, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of T. E. Chase for a writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of Thomas Gibbons

  • Earliest record date: February 22, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Soo Hoo Wing for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 3, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: immigration | Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Order of discharge | released from custody

In re application for writ of habeas corpus by Lizzie Hendrickson

  • Earliest record date: February 1, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of M. D. Getchie for discharge on writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 29, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Louis M. Cohn, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 17, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Dick Creol for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 16, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with intent to wound
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top