Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

Points of Law Cited

People

Earliest Record Date : 1869

11 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the Matter of the Application of Ah Chow for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 1, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: selling tobacco
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of C. H. Cook for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 20, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Lee Still for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 26, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John M. Boyls for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 8, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Eugene Crowne v. James McAuliff

  • Earliest record date: May 31, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: adultery | Carceral: fornication
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Daniel C. Harper for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 9, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Charles Dixon for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 9, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of Application of John Suelling for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 13, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice | Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

The People of the State of Nebraska vs. W.W. Armstrong and John A. Dunn

  • Earliest record date: September 11, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Moses Keokuk for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 21, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: leaving reservation wo permission from Indian Agent
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

A. N. Jones v. Territory of Washington

  • Earliest record date: April 21, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top