Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

Points of Law Cited

People

See more
Latest Record Year : 1896

19 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the Matter of the Application of M.L. Coovert for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 6, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling and furnishing cigarettes
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of William S. Garrett and John F. Meyers for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 11, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obstructing a US officer | Carceral: delaying the execution of US law | Carceral: assault with a deadly weapon
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Not in custody

In the matter of the application of Spafford Woodhull for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 7, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: murder
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Wilson Hike for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 10, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application on behalf of Charles M. Bachman for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 6, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bastardy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Jerome K. Coulter for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 10, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Patrick Martin for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 14, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

App. of Charles E. McHugh for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 6, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: seduction
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Victor B. Walker for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for the person of Henry Moore

  • Earliest record date: March 26, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Alfred Bradden for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 31, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Eugene F. Ladd for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 31, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Application of George Webb for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 24, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In Re Pet. of Millie F. Porter for Habeas Corp.

  • Earliest record date: April 28, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of George Dunn for Writ of Habeas Corpus (B)

  • Earliest record date: May 11, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

State of Nebraska on the relation of Samuel J. Coffman vs. India A. Coffman

  • Earliest record date: May 15, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In Re Petition for Habeas Corpus for R. E. McKenzie

  • Earliest record date: September 20, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Elmer Buchanan for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 20, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: disturbing the peace | Carceral: drunk and disorderly
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In Re Application of Edward Sprouse for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 1, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Link Rothwell for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 5, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: trespass
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody
Back to top