Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
Latest Record Year : 1895

23 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of Chas. Graham for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 29, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: robbery
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of L. Griffith for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 1, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Daniel S. Conroy for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 18, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Michael J. Corrigan for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 6, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Howard Litz for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 10, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of James Griffin, William Beck, and William O'Brien for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 7, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Crist Tyrrell for a Writ of Habeas Corpus through his friend and agent Sigmund Arnstein

  • Earliest record date: January 15, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: unlawfully soliciting business
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of H. A. Reese for a writ of Habeas Corpus for & on behalf of Grant Willoby

  • Earliest record date: February 11, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of Henry E. Smith by Florence Smith, his guardian, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 13, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary and larceny
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re Habeas Corpus Myrtle Watson

  • Earliest record date: September 1, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Beula Dixon and Maud Lewis for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 20, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Harry L. Davis for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 29, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice | Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Sigmund Arnstein for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 29, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Charles Lewis and Ellis Hyde for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 22, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drunk and disorderly
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of L. L. Lindsey for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 4, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Oscar B. Hill for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 12, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Application of Eva Miller & Jessie Miller (Minors) for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 4, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In reapplication of James Miller for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 22, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: burglary
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Henry Rasmus for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 22, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In the Matter of the Application of Frank G. Nelson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 31, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Not in custody

In the Matter of the application of Tom Wagner for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 11, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Louis Seiffer, imprisoned under the name of David S. Berman, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 1, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In the matter of the application of Lenora McMullen, on behalf of Fran McMullen for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 26, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody
Back to top