Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
Latest Record Year : 1892

22 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of Otilla Brinkman for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 14, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re-application of A. B. Cabe for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 5, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Henry Neal for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 8, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: arson
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Mrs. Jennie Wingate for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 21, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of G.W. Crowell for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 9, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: being a disorderly person
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Albert Davidson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 22, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bastardy
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Frank E. Shupe for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 9, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John W. McDaniel for a writ of Habeas Corpus for William C. McDaniel

  • Earliest record date: June 23, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of J.H. Foster for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 2, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In Re the Petition of Juan Rey Abeita for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 5, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: Indian agent/superintendent
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Victor Pinot and Mrs. Pinot for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 16, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: Commission of a felony
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of L. M. Hunter for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 20, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Albert Friedrich for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 17, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: first degree murder
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of William Prido for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 18, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of R. J. Alton for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 23, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor without a license
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Matter of the Application by Henry Burman for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for May Burman

  • Earliest record date: September 14, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached | released from custody

In the matter of the application of F. J. Phillips for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 17, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bastardy
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Anton Berneker for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 2, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Matter of Application of Emma Clifton for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 16, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of William Bridwell for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 8, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of William P. Dinkens for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 24, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bastardy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of T. Blackburn for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 7, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody
Back to top