Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
Latest Record Year : 1890

32 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the Proceedings in Habeas Corpus in behalf of Evelyn E Miller, on Petition and Application of Louis B. Millerburrb

  • Earliest record date: August 4, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody | new custody arrangement reached

In the matter of the application of William H. Martin for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 1, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of John Breen for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 15, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling and dealing narcotic drugs
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of Thomas Rice for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 16, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: Habitual Drunkenness
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of John W. Hall for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 15, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of James Sanford for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 15, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Melinda Ellis for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 19, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Himan Klimax for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 27, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of application of Alexander Vachon for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 4, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bigamy
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of L.S. Bartlett for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 9, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: embezzlement
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Fred Brandon for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 3, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: adultery
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Application of J. F. Riley for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 9, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: robbery
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Charles Sarvis for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 21, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of Application of John Morgan for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 21, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Claude H. Goldsborough on relation of his mother Izora I. Goldsborough for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 28, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached

In the matter of the application of Ugean Miller for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 1, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: petty larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of H. T. Thomas for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 7, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of F. J. Smith for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 7, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with a deadly weapon
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Frank Williams, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 24, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Bert Lockerby for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 15, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bastardy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of James Shay for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 16, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drunkenness
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Not in custody

In the matter of the application of John Reilly for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 17, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drunkenness | Carceral: disorderly conduct
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of application of M. O. Ricketts for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for the body of ‘Till’

  • Earliest record date: October 20, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: wrongful enslavement
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of George Sellers for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 18, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: voter fraud
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Charles Pollow for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 7, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of August C. Uhtof for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 7, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter if the application of N. F. Britt for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 19, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Charles H. Gaydou for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Charles Gaydou

  • Earliest record date: November 21, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: New custody arrangement reached | released from custody

In the matter of the application of Ah Sing for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 19, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault with intent to kill
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Redden Jones for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 8, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the petition of James Oswald on behalf of Bill Oswald for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and the Answer of E. M. Croisan Sheriff of Marion County, Oregon to said Writ

  • Earliest record date: October 1, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In re application of Rose Van Ormer by her next friend John Van Ormer for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 4, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top