Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
Petition Subtype : Institutional: juvenile detention

16 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the Matter of the application of Elmer Buchanan for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 17, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the application of Viola Mills, a Minor under the age of 21 years, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 5, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 23, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Lee Helsley on behalf of Lizzie Hurd for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 21, 1900
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Sarah D. Bassett for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 18, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Virgie La Grand, ex rel James La Grand, her husband, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus vs. Esther M. Hopkins, Supt. State Industrial School for Girls

  • Earliest record date: November 7, 1914
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention | Institutional: spousal custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Application of Frances Anzalone by Sebastino Anzalone (her husband) and Joe Valendi (her father) for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 12, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention | Institutional: spousal custody | Carceral: marriage within legal degree of consanguinity
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of William M. Zook For a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 14, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: spousal custody | Institutional: juvenile detention | Institutional: disability
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Otto Rose for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 7, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Edward Toman for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 7, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified | Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Harriet O'Grady, on behalf of Myrtle O'Grady, vs. Doctor J. N. Smith, Superintendent of the State Institution for Feeble Minded

  • Earliest record date: May 1, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of M. L. Hills and Myrtle Hills for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 19, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of A. Leonard Mossberger, ex rel, Leslie Mossberger, a minor, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 16, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention | Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Simon B. Swab for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 18, 1908
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Frank Councilman, and Isabelle Councilman, Petitioners and Plaintiffs vs. The State Institution for the Feeble Minded, and J. N. Smith, Superintendent of said Institution

  • Earliest record date: October 19, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Edna Brookfield for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 2, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody
Back to top