Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

Points of Law Cited

People

See more
Petition Subtype : Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine

29 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the Matter of the Application of Ah Chow for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 1, 1869
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: selling tobacco
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Territory of Washington v. Chin Chung. Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 10, 1882
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use | Carceral: opium use | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Sid Howard for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 10, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: drug use | Carceral: opium use | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Charles Barnes for a writ of Habeas Corpus.

  • Earliest record date: January 4, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: breaking and entering | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Foong V. William Murphy. Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 1, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: peddling without a license
  • Petition outcome: Petition denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of James McDevitt for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 1, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: hog theft | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of August Klabunde for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 10, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Nicholas Dick for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 1, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: disturbing the peace | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re: application of C.P. Bishop and N. H. McLean for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 6, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the application of Bertha Faust for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 14, 1896
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: prostitution | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Application of George Schuler for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 25, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: selling liquor without a license
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Henry Bancroft for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 28, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling liquor without a license | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Gaston Akoun, Madroche Zitoune, Abraham L. Reed, and S. B. Wadley for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 30, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: violation of injunction
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Samuel Jackson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 30, 1900
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault and battery | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Oliver Lachapell for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 31, 1900
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: using obscene language in the presence of women | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Joe Lachapell for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 31, 1900
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: using obscene language in the presence of women | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of John Walker for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 25, 1900
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: bastardy | Carceral: subornation of perjury | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Lee Fong for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 14, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: violation of city ordinance
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Robert Welts for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 13, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: selling liquor without a license
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of W. L. Lafferty by his attorney Francis J. Lynch for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 10, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: peddling without a license | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: municipal violation
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Ernest Hutchinson a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 1, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: selling trade stamps without a licence | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application Susie Jackson for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 5, 1915
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of application of William Wernsen for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 25, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Petition of Bertram Mulcahy for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 6, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: peddling without a license | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: municipal violation
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re app of Mack Dwyer for writ of H.C.

  • Earliest record date: August 28, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of William, A Chinaman, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 24, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: opium use | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine | Carceral: drug use
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Habeas Corpus in the matter of William Omara & Margaret Omara

  • Earliest record date: June 1, 1855
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Petition withdrawn
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application for writ of Habeas Corpus of H. W. Hull

  • Earliest record date: April 21, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: keeping a house of ill repute | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Samuel Gowen and Donald Webster for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 24, 1883
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: assault | Carceral: refusal or inability to pay fine
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody
Back to top