Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
Petition Subtype : Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses

21 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the Application of William Spears and James McGough for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 26, 1883
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Peter Westlin for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 15, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Alice A. Parker for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 31, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

Application of James (Jas.) H. Howard for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 13, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of R. D. Watson for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 3, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of Fred Goldman, Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 3, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses | Carceral: assault with a deadly weapon
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of O. J. Watkins for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 11, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Mike Aboud for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 21, 1905
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In the matter of the application of D. O. Belt for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 28, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Habeas Corpus of Jack Sommer for Dave Rubenstein against Claude Bannick

  • Earliest record date: June 7, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Sulton Shoenbrum for Writ of Habeas Corpus Vs. John J. Donahue, Chief of Police of the City of Omaha

  • Earliest record date: June 15, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Habeas Corpus of A. H. Hubbard against Claude Bannick Chief of Police

  • Earliest record date: October 17, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

In the matter of the application of Charles Myers, on Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 29, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses | Carceral: obtaining goods under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

A. J. Schmoker v. Felix J. McShane Jr. and Henry Schroeder

  • Earliest record date: August 26, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

The United States of America upon the relation of John R. Howard v. James B. Nickerson, Acting United States Marshal for the District of Nebraska, and Edwin C. Boehler, United States Commissioner for the Omaha Division, District of Nebraska and Michael L. Clark, Sheriff of Douglas County, Nebraska

  • Earliest record date: May 7, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice | Carceral: uttering and passing forged paper | Carceral: robbery and battery | Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

The United States of America upon the relation of Harry Compton v. James B. Nickerson, Acting United States Marshal for the District of Nebraska, and Edwin C. Boehler, United States Commissioner for the Omaha Division, District of Nebraska and Michael L. Clark, Sheriff of Douglas County, Nebraska

  • Earliest record date: May 7, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice | Carceral: uttering and passing forged paper | Carceral: robbery and battery | Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

The United States of America upon the relation of Arthur Wyse v. James B. Nickerson, Acting United States Marshal for the District of Nebraska, and Edwin C. Boehler, United States Commissioner for the Omaha Division, District of Nebraska and Michael L. Clark, Sheriff of Douglas County, Nebraska

  • Earliest record date: May 7, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice | Carceral: uttering and passing forged paper | Carceral: robbery and battery | Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

The United States of America upon the relation of Axel Pierson v. James B. Nickerson, Acting United States Marshal for the District of Nebraska, and Edwin C. Boehler, United States Commissioner for the Omaha Division, District of Nebraska and Michael L. Clark, Sheriff of Douglas County, Nebraska

  • Earliest record date: May 7, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: fugitive from justice | Carceral: uttering and passing forged paper | Carceral: robbery and battery | Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of David S. Patterson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 16, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: larceny | Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application of Joseph Sloan for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 15, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Gustav Rittmaster for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 23, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: obtaining money under false pretenses | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top