Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

People

See more
Petition Subtype : Carceral: forgery

18 results

Download JSON Download CSV

Habeas Corpus in the Matter of Wm Rotenback

  • Earliest record date: December 11, 1855
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the Matter of the Application of Julius Leiffman for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 7, 1880
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of L. T. Savacool for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 18, 1884
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of T. Judson Ferguson for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 7, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In matter of application of Mortimer Fox by Parke Godwin for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 13, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Mortimer Fox by his next friend and counsel Parke Godwin for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 24, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the application of James E. Botts for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 19, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of J. P. Black for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 28, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Louis Seiffer, imprisoned under the name of David S. Berman, for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 1, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Custody transferred to third party

In the matter of the application of George Davis for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 2, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application of Edward Filger for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 20, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In Re Petition of Do Gin for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 18, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of R. E. Berry for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 22, 1907
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Ralph O. Urban for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 11, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Habeas Corpus of O. R. Blystone against Robert Hodge, Sheriff

  • Earliest record date: December 5, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: grand larceny | Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of George Leib on Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 10, 1860
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: wrongful imprisonment | Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

James G. V. Ingoldsby, Plaintiff v. W. T. Fenton, Warden State Penitentiary of the State of Nebraska, Defendant

  • Earliest record date: June 16, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery | Carceral: uttering | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of C. S. Nelson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 5, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: forgery
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top