Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Type of Source

Length of Case File

Points of Law Cited

People

See more
Petition Subtype : Carceral

56 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of P. H. McNamara for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 19, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of H. T. Thomas for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 7, 1890
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Maria Miller for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 7, 1891
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of J.H. Foster for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 2, 1889
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: gambling
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of L. M. Hunter for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 20, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of William Prido for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 18, 1892
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the Application of William Shooks for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 12, 1893
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the application of Frank Dupree for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 30, 1894
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: grand larceny
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Howard Litz for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 10, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of Sigmund Arnstein for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 29, 1895
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application for Habeas Corpus for Jay Roy

  • Earliest record date: May 3, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In Re Habeas Corpus of D. B. Davidson

  • Earliest record date: August 29, 1898
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Adam Treger for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 14, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Edward Ladd for writ of Habeas Corpus Case No:34690

  • Earliest record date: February 11, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: fugitive from justice
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Frances Palmer for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 18, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Petition of Frank E. Sims for Habeaus Corpus for F. W. Beyer

  • Earliest record date: December 10, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Petition of Frank E. Sims for Habeaus Corpus for F. W. Beyer

  • Earliest record date: December 10, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Jeannie Du Bois for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 26, 1903
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the Application of James O'Donnell for writ Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 2, 1904
  • Petition type(s): Interpersonal: divorce | Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Nick Mordavick, Plaintiff, vs. Joseph R. H. Jacoby, as Marshall of the above named District, Defendant

  • Earliest record date: April 21, 1912
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Habeas Corpus of William Young against Edward Cudihee as "Sheriff"

  • Earliest record date: January 28, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released on bail

Habeas Corpus of H. Segawa against Claude Bannick Chief of Police

  • Earliest record date: February 8, 1913
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of J. A. Marcil for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 21, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: parole violation
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Application of James A. Marcil for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 21, 1902
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Institutional: imprisoned for longer than term
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In re: E. Stubley on Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: February 1, 1909
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: imprisoned for longer than term | Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Charles Bird - and Josephine Bird, also known as Jack Lewis, by Irene Steward, petitioner for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 6, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of George H. Harris for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 28, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application of Glen Hull for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 22, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re application of Henry Peterson for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 30, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Joseph Alexa for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 13, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re appl’n Joe Ronneburg for writ Habeas Corpus vs. Marshall Eberstern Chief of Police, John Brigss Chief of Detectives, Captain Vanous, Captain of Police of Omaha

  • Earliest record date: October 3, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Joe Petrovick for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 31, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In re application of Kate Petrovick for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 31, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In re application of John Larkovich, as known as, John Karkovich for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 31, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In re application of Mary Larkovich known as Mary Karkovich for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 31, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of R.E. Wilkinson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 10, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Cloid J. Wilson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 29, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of Thomas Sullivan on writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 13, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: statutory rape
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In re application of Mildred Ashlyn for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 8, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Gordon Wells for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: September 2, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re Petition of Joseph Menzies by Frank H. Kelley, his attorney, for Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 22, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: contempt of court
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Amos Milling for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 15, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: cause unspecified
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Thomas Wyatt Robinson and Bessie Kraus for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 13, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

On the Matter of the Application of Susie Hunter for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 19, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of application of Fred Sledge for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 19, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of application of George Painter for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 18, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Carl Fisher for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 12, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral | Carceral: no charge
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Edgar I. Fuller for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 27, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Anna Nocita for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 3, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Philmore David and Ellison Blackford for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 20, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Carceral
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top