Skip to main content
« Back to Explore

Cases

Habeas petitions described a broad range of carceral, institutional, and interpersonal confinement over the long nineteenth century, including those used to demand due process, resist enslavement, challenge child removal and reservation confinement, avoid deportation, present child custody claims and protest child marriage, and to challenge institutionalization and detention in private and state institutions. As a legal mechanism borrowed from British common law and guaranteed as a civil right in US federal and state constitutions, habeas provides a lens on a diverse community of legal actors.

Our encoding practice allows us to identify petitions in these three categories and to indicate where those categories overlap. In addition to these three general categories, our team has identified the specific carceral charge being challenged as well as the particular forms of institutional and interpersonal confinements being questioned.

You may also browse or search petitions by location and/or jurisdiction to learn more about the myriad complaints petitioners brought before judges in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Washington between 1812 and 1924. Each case entry includes a full citation, a summary, links to people with a role in the case, a list of other people named, and any sites of significance. Visitors wanting access to full case files can contact the cited repository for information about obtaining copies. Those without institutional affiliations may request image scans from Dr. Jagodinsky directly. The Glossary defines the attributes used to structure data from the habeas petitions. The Code Book explains the relational structure of the data and functionality of the database website.

Filter by:

Date

Drag slider to explore cases

Dates: -

Petition Type

Petition Subtype

Petition Outcome

Fate of Bound Party

Sex of Bound Party

Age of Bound Party

Race of Bound Party

Petition Year

Earliest Record Date

Latest Record Year

Court Name

Type of Source

Length of Case File

Points of Law Cited

See more

People

See more
Petition Type : Institutional

215 results

Download JSON Download CSV

In the matter of the application of Mary Peterson for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 16, 1886
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of M. L. Hills and Myrtle Hills for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 19, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Fred Busch for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 20, 1924
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

Harriet O'Grady, on behalf of Myrtle O'Grady, vs. Doctor J. N. Smith, Superintendent of the State Institution for Feeble Minded

  • Earliest record date: May 1, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of application of Charles Flournoy for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 9, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Not in custody

In the matter of the application of Laura M. Parker for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Joyce McCaulley and Ray McCaulley Jr.

  • Earliest record date: April 26, 1923
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Marie Philbrick for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 20, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Edward Toman for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 7, 1922
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: cause unspecified | Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Della Carbaugh for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 4, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: spousal custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of James Nesladek and Anna Nesladek for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 25, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody | Carceral: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody | custody transferred to third party

In the matter of the application of Agnes Smith for a writ of habeas corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 19, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: disability
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Agnes Smith for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 24, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: disability
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Otto Rose for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 7, 1921
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Petition of George Arthur Brown for a writ of Habeas Corpus for George Uber

  • Earliest record date: May 16, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Peter Mangen for a writ of Habeas Corpus for Hazel May Mangen

  • Earliest record date: November 1, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Stella Taylor for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 14, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention | Carceral: vagrancy | Carceral: prostitution
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

The State of Nebraska, upon the relation of Mattie Cahill, Complainant, vs. Marshall Eberstein, Chief of Police of Omaha, Nebraska and Alta Berger, Matron and Superintendent of Omaha Detention Hospital, Eleventh and Dodge Streets, Omaha, Nebraska, Respondents.

  • Earliest record date: September 16, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention | Carceral: inmate of ill-governed house
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

The State of Nebraska, upon the relation of Opal Rogers, Complaint, vs. Marshall Eberstein, Chief of Police of Omaha, Nebr. and Alta Berger, Matron and Superintendent of Omaha Detention Hospital, Eleventh and Dodge Sts., Omaha, Nebraka, Respondents.

  • Earliest record date: September 16, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention | Carceral: inmate of ill-governed house
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Marie Paulson Hislop on behalf of Herbert Paulson and Robert Paulson for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 16, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the Matter of the Application of Edna Sullivan and Geraldine Sullivan for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 10, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: convent
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the Matter of the Application of William M. Zook For a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 14, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: spousal custody | Institutional: juvenile detention | Institutional: disability
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Mario Lozito for writ of Habeas Corpus for Francesca Lozito

  • Earliest record date: February 16, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ vacated
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of application of Mabel Brooks by her attorney Daniel Horrigan for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 31, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the Application of Frances Anzalone by Sebastino Anzalone (her husband) and Joe Valendi (her father) for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 12, 1920
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: juvenile detention | Institutional: spousal custody | Carceral: marriage within legal degree of consanguinity
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Frances Hulm For a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: December 27, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Sadie Millett and Harry D. Ryan, for the writ of Habeas Corpus for the custody of Constance Cheshire

  • Earliest record date: March 9, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re application of Frank Kreishutz for Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 14, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: insanity
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Arthur Treichel, minor on the part of Marie Holz and Adolph Holz for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 2, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Dismissed

In the matter of application of Margaret Grundy by Mrs. Roy Davis her mother and next friend for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: August 23, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: convent
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

Nora Sullivan v. Henry M. White

  • Earliest record date: July 16, 1916
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: immigration
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Nellie Atkins for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 16, 1919
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Maud Shaw by Jud Brown for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 5, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Marie Wells for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 16, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of William Carthrum for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: October 16, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Genevieve Shoemaker for a Writ of Habeas Corpus <Frankie LaPorte>

  • Earliest record date: March 5, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Joe Lacorte for writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 18, 1899
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: seeking exemption from draft
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In re application of Lena Heaton for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 20, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In re application of Mrs. Carmen Lynne for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 20, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

Ex Rel Ruth Livingston vs. Dr. Ernest T. Manning Health Commissioner, City of Omaha and Alta Burger Superintendant Detention Home for Girls, For Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 15, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: public health detention | Carceral: inmate of ill-governed home
  • Petition outcome: Writ dismissed for want of prosecution
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Blanche Barry for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 10, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Institutional: public health detention
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of Bessie Berry for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: July 6, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Carceral: vagrancy | Institutional: vagrancy
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Frank M. Ringer for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: March 26, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: seeking exemption from draft
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Phillip Chiantis for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: June 5, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: seeking exemption from draft
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Released from custody

In the matter of the application of Theofarius George Mastoros for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: April 13, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: conscription
  • Petition outcome: Unknown
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Gerasimos Nicolovinis for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: May 1, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: seeking exemption from draft
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In re application of Mary Harmon for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: January 24, 1918
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: convent
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown

In the matter of the application of Michel Koseris for a writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Earliest record date: November 7, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: seeking exemption from draft
  • Petition outcome: Writ denied
  • Fate of bound party: Remained in custody

In the matter of the application of George Craig, Olie Williamson and Mabel Williamson

  • Earliest record date: February 7, 1917
  • Petition type(s): Institutional: child custody
  • Petition outcome: Writ allowed
  • Fate of bound party: Unknown
Back to top